mirror of
https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome.git
synced 2026-03-04 00:01:12 -05:00
Replicate Settings Between Instances #2147
Labels
No labels
P1: Critical
P2: High
P3: Medium
P4: Low
UI
bug
cannot reproduce
compatibility
dependencies
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
external libs
feature request
good first issue
help wanted
infrastructure
invalid
localization
needs investigation
performance
potential-duplicate
question
recurrent
research
snap
waiting for data
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/AdGuardHome#2147
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @ted-gould on GitHub (Nov 15, 2020).
Problem Description
On my home network I have two Ubuntu Core Adguard Home appliances each running on it's own RPi. This is so that I have a backup and can easily move them around without taking down the whole network. While it isn't a huge deal, it would be nice if they had the same settings. I've messed this up more than once and it gets really confusing when they're not the same.
Proposed Solution
I'd like to be able to set one of them up as a "settings sync" mode where it would pull the settings from the other one. This way I could set the settings on the primary and the secondary would get them in due time (doesn't have to be immediate, but would be nice to be reasonably quick). It would be nice if I could also set up more than two as I have pis that I'd like to retire. (I think there's a reasonable use-case for three, but I don't see a reason to have more than one primary)
Alternatives Considered
Probably going to get up some sort of rsync scheme in the mean time. But that's kinda a "hacker solution" and it'd be nice to have something other people could do as well.
@ameshkov commented on GitHub (Nov 16, 2020):
Duplicate of #573