starred/AdGuardHome

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome.git synced 2026-03-04 00:01:12 -05:00

What about Flatpak build? #3616

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-04 03:58:34 -05:00 by deekerman · 8 comments

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 03:58:34 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @ammnt on GitHub (Apr 13, 2022).

Hello,

I can't find anything about Flatpak build of AdGuard Home. Please think about it.

Thank you.
Best regards🚀

Originally created by @ammnt on GitHub (Apr 13, 2022). Hello, I can't find anything about Flatpak build of AdGuard Home. Please think about it. Thank you. Best regards🚀

deekerman added the

feature request

infrastructure

labels

2026-03-04 03:58:34 -05:00

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 03:58:42 -05:00

Author

Owner

@ainar-g commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2022):

I'm going to be honest, supporting both Snapcraft and Docker builds already increases the complexity of the release process a fair bit. So official Flatpak builds from AdGuard are probably not going to happen in the nearest future. Perhaps, some people from the community could make their own builds.

@ainar-g commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2022): I'm going to be honest, supporting both Snapcraft and Docker builds already increases the complexity of the release process a fair bit. So official Flatpak builds from AdGuard are probably not going to happen in the nearest future. Perhaps, some people from the community could make their own builds.

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 03:58:46 -05:00

Author

Owner

@iMonZ commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2022):

I'm going to be honest, supporting both Snapcraft and Docker builds already increases the complexity of the release process a fair bit. So official Flatpak builds from AdGuard are probably not going to happen in the nearest future. Perhaps, some people from the community could make their own builds.

That’s actually not true.
This specific things can be automated.
While Snapcraft only Ubuntu is using, flatpaks are used by every else system.

@iMonZ commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2022): > I'm going to be honest, supporting both Snapcraft and Docker builds already increases the complexity of the release process a fair bit. So official Flatpak builds from AdGuard are probably not going to happen in the nearest future. Perhaps, some people from the community could make their own builds. That’s actually not true. This specific things can be automated. While Snapcraft only Ubuntu is using, flatpaks are used by every else system.

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 03:58:46 -05:00

Author

Owner

@t3dium commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2022):

I get the hate for snap on desktops: you open applications frequently. But on a server: do you really care about a couple secs slower startup, once?

@t3dium commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2022): I get the hate for snap on desktops: you open applications frequently. But on a server: do you really care about a couple secs slower startup, once?

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 03:58:46 -05:00

Author

Owner

@ainar-g commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2022):

@t3dium, please keep the discussion in this issue on-topic. Discussions of Snapcraft are better off in Discussions or somewhere else. Thanks.

@ainar-g commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2022): @t3dium, please keep the discussion in this issue on-topic. Discussions of Snapcraft are better off in Discussions or somewhere else. Thanks.

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 03:58:46 -05:00

Author

Owner

@iMonZ commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2022):

I get the hate for snap on desktops: you open applications frequently. But on a server: do you really care about a couple secs slower startup, once?

That’s not the point.
Flatpak has really good features like flatseal and most operating systems are using this instead of Snapcraft.
That’s the point.
Even on Ubuntu the Snapcraft users are sinking because people replace it with flatpaks.

@iMonZ commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2022): > I get the hate for snap on desktops: you open applications frequently. But on a server: do you really care about a couple secs slower startup, once? That’s not the point. Flatpak has really good features like flatseal and most operating systems are using this instead of Snapcraft. That’s the point. Even on Ubuntu the Snapcraft users are sinking because people replace it with flatpaks.

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 03:58:46 -05:00

Author

Owner

@archerallstars commented on GitHub (May 2, 2023):

Flatpak would be a better choice than Snapcraft as it's supported everywhere, especially on immutable oses. For example, MicroOS doesn't support snap apps at all. I don't know about Silverblue, though.

@archerallstars commented on GitHub (May 2, 2023): Flatpak would be a better choice than Snapcraft as it's supported everywhere, especially on immutable oses. For example, **[MicroOS doesn't support snap apps at all](https://www.reddit.com/r/openSUSE/comments/uqfcoq/microos_and_snapd/)**. I don't know about Silverblue, though.

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 03:58:46 -05:00

Author

Owner

@ghost commented on GitHub (Nov 28, 2023):

Are there any plans on the distant horizon to implement this yet?

@ghost commented on GitHub (Nov 28, 2023): Are there any plans on the distant horizon to implement this yet?

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 03:58:46 -05:00

Author

Owner

@NamelessGO commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2024):

In addition to @archerallstars comment, we have this post from NextCloud
https://github.com/nextcloud-snap/nextcloud-snap/wiki/Why-Ubuntu-is-the-only-supported-distro

@NamelessGO commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2024): In addition to @archerallstars comment, we have this post from NextCloud https://github.com/nextcloud-snap/nextcloud-snap/wiki/Why-Ubuntu-is-the-only-supported-distro

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/AdGuardHome#3616

No description provided.

Rows
Columns