mirror of
https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome.git
synced 2026-03-04 00:01:12 -05:00
Block and allow lists per device #4615
Labels
No labels
P1: Critical
P2: High
P3: Medium
P4: Low
UI
bug
cannot reproduce
compatibility
dependencies
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
external libs
feature request
good first issue
help wanted
infrastructure
invalid
localization
needs investigation
performance
potential-duplicate
question
recurrent
research
snap
waiting for data
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/AdGuardHome#4615
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @rubenvarela on GitHub (Jul 25, 2023).
Prerequisites
I have checked the Wiki and Discussions and found no answer
I have searched other issues and found no duplicates
I want to request a feature or enhancement and not ask a question
The problem
I have a subscription to paramount+.
Looking online, to make it work, I need to add a few domains to the allowlist,
Looking at the lists, it contains things like facebook, amazon ads, doubleclick, etc.
Proposed solution
I only need this on one device. Since a request contains the address of the host asking for resolution, I propose we have a way of adding, per host, allow and block rules.
Alternatives considered and additional information
Running another instance. Leaving the current one as the default propagated to device on the network and for the one device, set it's DNS server manually.
The con is that I have to add another instance just for this device. In my case, that's another VM to get another IP which is heavy on it's own vs managing it within the current instance.
@ainar-g commented on GitHub (Aug 9, 2023):
@rubenvarela, sounds like either a use for the
clientmodifier or a duplicate of #435?@rubenvarela commented on GitHub (Aug 14, 2023):
@ainar-g Dupe of #435. Thank you for pointing that one out.