Release rejected - Better indication what exactly caused it #3327

Closed
opened 2026-02-20 02:16:52 -05:00 by deekerman · 5 comments
Owner

Originally created by @PeterCodar on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023).

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing open and closed issues

I'm not sure, maybe it is related to https://github.com/Lidarr/Lidarr/issues/2632

As you can see in this screenshot, a found possible album match has been rejected by two causes:
The size and my custom format.

This FR is about the size.
If the rejection is based on quality settings: Which quality exactly is causing this?
There is no obvious setting I can find for "maximum allowed 116,1 MB"?

Lidarr - Release rejected

Describe the solution you'd like

Indicate that the setting - for example - "MP3-VBR-V2" with the current settings is causing the rejection.

You could show it as the same "MP3-VBR-V2" label. Just color the background red - for example.
image

Describe alternatives you've considered

Alternative solution:
Let the user disable the entire quality settings if an "Interactive Search" is used.

Anything else?

Nothing else.

Originally created by @PeterCodar on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023). ### Is there an existing issue for this? - [X] I have searched the existing open and closed issues ### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe I'm not sure, maybe it is related to https://github.com/Lidarr/Lidarr/issues/2632 As you can see in this screenshot, a found possible album match has been rejected by two causes: The size and my custom format. This FR is about the size. If the rejection is based on quality settings: Which quality exactly is causing this? There is no obvious setting I can find for "maximum allowed 116,1 MB"? ![Lidarr - Release rejected](https://github.com/Lidarr/Lidarr/assets/18629146/1abf17dc-7ef9-46b7-8f42-d39e98c1be26) ### Describe the solution you'd like Indicate that the setting - for example - "MP3-VBR-V2" with the current settings is causing the rejection. You could show it as the same "MP3-VBR-V2" label. Just color the background red - for example. ![image](https://github.com/Lidarr/Lidarr/assets/18629146/96d09c0f-16df-4de0-b505-ee28a4f2f68a) ### Describe alternatives you've considered Alternative solution: Let the user disable the entire quality settings if an "Interactive Search" is used. ### Anything else? Nothing else.
deekerman 2026-02-20 02:16:52 -05:00
Author
Owner

@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023):

The Quality sizes is based on the bitrate for the quality selected which is then multiplied by the run time as indicated in the UI

the quality is clearly displayed as well, so not sure what this ask is?

@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023): The Quality sizes is based on the bitrate for the quality selected which is then multiplied by the run time as indicated in the UI the quality is clearly displayed as well, so not sure what this ask is?
Author
Owner

@PeterCodar commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023):

@bakerboy448
If it "is clearly displayed":
Please tell me from the above screenshot which quality setting is causing the rejection and has to be modified?

@PeterCodar commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023): @bakerboy448 If it "is clearly displayed": Please tell me from the above screenshot which quality setting is causing the rejection and has to be modified?
Author
Owner

@mynameisbogdan commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023):

Your popover is hiding the detected quality.

@mynameisbogdan commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023): Your popover is hiding the detected quality.
Author
Owner

@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023):

The reject hover over is blocking the quality of the album I believe, so it's not possible from your screenshot to say what quality the album is

Similarly your quality sizes cut off which quality

@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023): The reject hover over is blocking the quality of the album I believe, so it's not possible from your screenshot to say what quality the album is Similarly your quality sizes cut off which quality
Author
Owner

@PeterCodar commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023):

🤦‍♂️ Of course, you are both right!

Without hovering over the exlamation mark, I can now also see it. 🧐
image

I'm sorry!

@PeterCodar commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023): 🤦‍♂️ Of course, you are both right! Without hovering over the exlamation mark, I can now also see it. 🧐 ![image](https://github.com/Lidarr/Lidarr/assets/18629146/01e3af89-4763-4135-a52f-f01d2ec1395a) I'm sorry!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/Lidarr#3327
No description provided.