mirror of
https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube.git
synced 2026-03-02 22:57:11 -05:00
Another moderation way by transferring an automatically blocked video to a trusted account #5487
Labels
No labels
Component: Accessibility
Component: Administration
Component: Auth
Component: CLI
Component: Channels
Component: Chapters
Component: Comments
Component: Custom Markdown
Component: Docker 🐳
Component: Documentation 📚
Component: Email
Component: Embed
Component: Federation 🎡
Component: Import/Export
Component: Live
Component: Metadata
Component: Mobile
Component: Moderation :godmode:
Component: Notifications
Component: Object storage
Component: Observability
Component: PeerTube Plugin 📦
Component: Player ⏯️
Component: Playlist
Component: Recommendation
Component: Redundancy
Component: Registration
Component: Runners
Component: SEO
Component: Search
Component: Security
Component: Stats
Component: Studio
Component: Studio
Component: Subscriptions
Component: Subtitles 💬
Component: Transcoding
Component: Upload
Component: Video Import
Component: i18n 🔡
Priority: High
Priority: Low
Priority: Roadmap
Status: Blocked ✋
Status: In Progress 🔜
Status: To Reproduce
Status: Waiting for answer
Template not filled
Type: Bug 🐛
Type: Discussion 💭
Type: Discussion 💭
Type: Duplicate ➿
Type: Feature Request ✨
Type: Maintenance 👷♀️
Type: Performance
Type: Question
UI
good first issue
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/PeerTube#5487
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @rorizhang on GitHub (Apr 18, 2024).
Describe the problem to be solved
No response
Describe the solution you would like
When a user without exemption from review authority uploads a video, by transferring ownership to another user who does have exemption from review authority, that user can directly publish the video. In this way, it is possible to effectively achieve the result of having the video reviewed by a specific user, without having to give excessive permissions to that user at the same time.
By the way, please add transferring ownership issue into notification list.
@Chocobozzz commented on GitHub (Apr 22, 2024):
Hello,
If the user that accepts to receive the video is trusted, IMHO it's an expected behaviour that the video is automatically published.
@rorizhang commented on GitHub (Apr 22, 2024):
Or can be published by consider of the user who is trusted. Now it must be moderated.
@Chocobozzz commented on GitHub (Apr 22, 2024):
I think I misunderstood your issue.
Can you fill the following template?
Describe the current behavior
Describe the problem to be solved
Describe the solution you would like
@rorizhang commented on GitHub (Apr 22, 2024):
Describe the current behavior
User A is a regular user, but has exemption from review rights. User B is also a regular user, without any review exemption rights. When user B creates a video, and transfers all the rights to user A, user A, even after accepting the transfer, is unable to genuinely publish that video before it is approved by the reviewer.
Describe the problem to be solved
Following normal logic, since user A already has review exemption rights, after accepting the video transferred from other users, they should have the right to decide whether to publicly publish the video.
Describe the solution you would like
Hope to add the right for user A to choose whether to publicly publish all videos under their name (exempt from review), including videos transferred from other users.
Another benefit of this is that it can indirectly give user A the right to review videos, but without the extensive permissions that a reviewer role holds.