Add additional URL to BitMagnet indexer definition to allow connections within docker-compose stack #1069

Closed
opened 2026-02-20 10:06:59 -05:00 by deekerman · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @tyrells on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024).

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing open and closed issues

Currently the only Base URL defined for the BitMagnet (Local DHT) indexer is http://127.0.0.1:3333/. When using Prowlarr and BitMagnet as part of a single docker-compose stack file (i.e. Servarr wiki Docker guide), you cannot connect to a different container in the same stack using the localhost IP address, but must rather use the container_name specified for the particular container you are trying to connect to.

Describe the solution you'd like

Add a second Base URL in the BitMagnet indexer definition file as follows http://bitmagnet:3333/. This is the container_name used in the official bitmagnet installation instructions.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Add additional common container names too, although I don't think this should be considered, as it has already been rejected in this issue: https://github.com/Prowlarr/Prowlarr/issues/2149

Anything else?

N/A

Originally created by @tyrells on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024). ### Is there an existing issue for this? - [X] I have searched the existing open and closed issues ### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe Currently the only Base URL defined for the BitMagnet (Local DHT) indexer is `http://127.0.0.1:3333/`. When using Prowlarr and BitMagnet as part of a single docker-compose stack file (i.e. [Servarr wiki Docker guide](https://wiki.servarr.com/docker-guide)), you cannot connect to a different container in the same stack using the localhost IP address, but must rather use the `container_name` specified for the particular container you are trying to connect to. ### Describe the solution you'd like Add a second Base URL in the BitMagnet indexer definition file as follows `http://bitmagnet:3333/`. This is the `container_name` used in the [official bitmagnet installation instructions](https://bitmagnet.io/setup/installation.html). ### Describe alternatives you've considered Add additional common container names too, although I don't think this should be considered, as it has already been rejected in this issue: https://github.com/Prowlarr/Prowlarr/issues/2149 ### Anything else? N/A
Author
Owner

@tyrells commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024):

Moving to Indexers repo

@tyrells commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024): Moving to Indexers repo
Author
Owner

@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024):

PR upstream to https://github.com/Jackett/Jackett/blob/master/src/Jackett.Common/Definitions/bitmagnet.yml
and it'll get pulled to Indexers next sync

@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024): PR upstream to https://github.com/Jackett/Jackett/blob/master/src/Jackett.Common/Definitions/bitmagnet.yml and it'll get pulled to Indexers next sync
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/Prowlarr#1069
No description provided.