starred/Radarr

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/Radarr/Radarr.git synced 2026-03-02 22:57:34 -05:00

[Request] Upgrade Priority with Download Clients #9013

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-20 00:09:38 -05:00 by deekerman · 4 comments

deekerman commented

2026-02-20 00:09:38 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @PatrickDollard on GitHub (Jan 9, 2025).

Is there an existing issue for this?

I have searched the existing open and closed issues

It'd be useful to set "Upgrade Priority" with the Download Clients.

Describe the solution you'd like

Doing so would allow for library upgrades, while also prioritizing newer content (even if it's "old").

Describe alternatives you've considered

Can't think of any way to do this without functionality built into Radarr

Anything else?

N/A

Originally created by @PatrickDollard on GitHub (Jan 9, 2025). ### Is there an existing issue for this? - [x] I have searched the existing open and closed issues ### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe It'd be useful to set "Upgrade Priority" with the Download Clients. ### Describe the solution you'd like Doing so would allow for library upgrades, while also prioritizing newer content (even if it's "old"). ### Describe alternatives you've considered Can't think of any way to do this without functionality built into Radarr ### Anything else? N/A

deekerman added the

Priority: Low

Type: Feature Request

Type: Enhancement

Area: Download Clients

Status: Unlikely

labels

2026-02-20 00:09:38 -05:00

deekerman commented

2026-02-20 00:09:38 -05:00

Author

Owner

@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2025):

Unclear feature request. Please specify exactly what you want and the usecase.

Upgrades with quality profile using quality or custom format score already exist

@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2025): Unclear feature request. Please specify exactly what you want and the usecase. Upgrades with quality profile using quality or custom format score already exist

deekerman commented

2026-02-20 00:09:39 -05:00

Author

Owner

@PatrickDollard commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2025):

Yes upgrades are available, but the behaviour with Download Clients means that they will be Prioritized the same and "new" or "old" files. I'd like the ability to have files being upgraded set to a lower priory with the Download Client.

@PatrickDollard commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2025): Yes upgrades are available, but the behaviour with Download Clients means that they will be Prioritized the same and "new" or "old" files. I'd like the ability to have files being upgraded set to a lower priory with the Download Client. ![priority](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/81249d41-0773-404f-b8f9-1646424f408b)

deekerman commented

2026-02-20 00:09:39 -05:00

Author

Owner

@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2025):

So two additional priorities - recent upgrade priority, old upgrade priority?

@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2025): So two additional priorities - recent upgrade priority, old upgrade priority?

deekerman commented

2026-02-20 00:09:39 -05:00

Author

Owner

@PatrickDollard commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2025):

Both would probably allow for the most functionality, but just adding "Upgrade Priority" would be nice. It'd end up with "Recent", "Old" and "Upgrade".

@PatrickDollard commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2025): Both would probably allow for the most functionality, but just adding "Upgrade Priority" would be nice. It'd end up with "Recent", "Old" and "Upgrade".