mirror of
https://github.com/Radarr/Radarr.git
synced 2026-03-02 22:57:34 -05:00
Add ability for smarter custom filters #9171
Labels
No labels
Area: API
Area: Database
Area: Db-migration
Area: Download Clients
Area: Extras
Area: Import Lists
Area: Indexer
Area: Metadata API
Area: Notifications
Area: Organizer
Area: Parser
Area: Scanning
Area: Tooling
Area: UI
Area: Unit Tests
On Hold: MetadataAPI Blocking
On Hold: MetadataAPI Blocking
Priority: High
Priority: Low
Priority: Medium
Status: Accepted
Status: Cannot Reproduce
Status: Confirmed
Status: Help Wanted
Status: In Progress
Status: Indexer - need invite
Status: Info Needed
Status: Investigating
Status: Logs Needed
Status: Maybe One Day
Status: Needs Triage
Status: On Hold
Status: Ready for Review
Status: Unlikely
Status: Waiting for OP
Status: Won't Fix
Type: Bug
Type: Documentation
Type: Duplicate
Type: Enhancement
Type: External Bug
Type: Feature Request
Type: Regression
Type: Support
Type: Support.
conflict
lidarr-pull
no-conflict
not-pulled
readarr-pull
readarr-pull
sonarr upstream
sonarr-pull
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/Radarr#9171
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @mountEvarus on GitHub (May 3, 2025).
Is there an existing issue for this?
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
As collections grow, it is harder to filter & understand the quality that has currently been achieved.
Describe the solution you'd like
I think it would be great to setup automatic filters for custom format fields (e.g. HDR, certain streaming services etc.) and qualities. We should be able to filter by these, combining multiple to understand our collections better
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/a
Anything else?
N/a
@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (May 3, 2025):
@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (May 3, 2025):
NEVER CHECK THE BOX SAYING YOU SEARCHED WHEN YOU MADE NO EFFORT TO SEARCH JUST BECAUSE THE BOX IS REQUIRED