Option to auto-delete, blocklist and re-search "potentially dangerous files" #9178

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-20 00:11:12 -05:00 by deekerman · 2 comments

deekerman commented

2026-02-20 00:11:12 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @TRusselo on GitHub (May 19, 2025).

Is there an existing issue for this?

I have searched the existing open and closed issues

With the uptick in fake/virus torrents the past year, I would love an automated way to handle them after download completes.

Describe the solution you'd like

I would love a checkbox option added to enable Auto-delete, blocklist and re-search all downloads that have the status of "potentially dangerous file"

Describe alternatives you've considered

manual handling

Anything else?

Originally created by @TRusselo on GitHub (May 19, 2025). ### Is there an existing issue for this? - [x] I have searched the existing open and closed issues ### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe With the uptick in fake/virus torrents the past year, I would love an automated way to handle them after download completes. ### Describe the solution you'd like I would love a checkbox option added to enable Auto-delete, blocklist and re-search all downloads that have the status of "potentially dangerous file" ### Describe alternatives you've considered manual handling ### Anything else? na

deekerman

2026-02-20 00:11:12 -05:00

closed this issue
added the
Type: Support.
label

deekerman commented

2026-02-20 00:11:13 -05:00

Author

Owner

@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (May 19, 2025):

~~No plans to automatically create hit and runs for users~~
This already exists, it was added at the same time potentially dangerous files were identified.

@bakerboy448 commented on GitHub (May 19, 2025): ~~No plans to automatically create hit and runs for users~~ This already exists, it was added at the same time potentially dangerous files were identified.

deekerman commented

2026-02-20 00:11:13 -05:00

Author

Owner

@TRusselo commented on GitHub (May 19, 2025):

my bad, it already exits under each indexer

@TRusselo commented on GitHub (May 19, 2025): my bad, it already exits under each indexer ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/21a01c9a-a8af-46ae-b498-a27daa05a99d)