mirror of
https://github.com/advplyr/audiobookshelf.git
synced 2026-03-02 22:46:56 -05:00
[Enhancement]: Collapse Collections #1711
Labels
No labels
authentication
awaiting release
backlog
bug
chapter editor
config-issue
ebooks
encoding/embedding
enhancement
help wanted
listening sessions & progress
planned
possible plugin
progress sync
sorting/filtering/searching
unable to reproduce
upload
users & permissions
waiting
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/audiobookshelf#1711
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @VinylscratchOP on GitHub (Dec 4, 2023).
Describe the feature/enhancement
checkmark box in the library section in the same way the "collapse series" button works, it would be useful for me sorting my new library so that only the unsorted things are visible in the library when the collections and series are collapsed.
@nichwall commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2023):
You can use the Filter > Missing > Series to help find things that aren't in a series.
Do you really want something like https://github.com/advplyr/audiobookshelf/issues/1465, but also adding a "Missing Collection" to the filter list?
@nichwall commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2023):
Hm. Although, looking at the data model filtering by "not in a collection" will be a more difficult filter to add. In the meantime, you could add books to a placeholder series (maybe named "In Collection") whenever you add it to a Collection, use the "Missing Series" filter, and then when you're done remove the books from the placeholder series.
@nichwall commented on GitHub (Dec 9, 2023):
Didn't realize that there is already a "Missing Collection" feature request https://github.com/advplyr/audiobookshelf/issues/599
@advplyr commented on GitHub (Dec 9, 2023):
Duplicate of #599