[Feature Request] Prebuilt image for embedded x86 systems (#2) #1406

Closed
opened 2026-02-28 00:42:36 -05:00 by deekerman · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @Giga-Pudding on GitHub (Oct 19, 2019).

Hi ccrisan,

I know you have answered this question already two years ago, but I would like to give two good reasons for providing a generic x86 image of Motion Eye.

The first thing is, that the currently supported hardware is (mostly) not powerfull enough, for the flawless processing of high resolution / high FPS Video. The second point is, that providing an x86 image would allow people to recycle old Hardware like Thin Clients and stuff.

I really prefer small single-board devices over fat old computers, but i think there are some good reasons though...

What do you think?

BR,
Giga

Originally created by @Giga-Pudding on GitHub (Oct 19, 2019). Hi ccrisan, I know [you have answered](https://github.com/ccrisan/motioneye/issues/619) this question already two years ago, but I would like to give two good reasons for providing a generic x86 image of Motion Eye. The first thing is, that the currently supported hardware is (mostly) not powerfull enough, for the flawless processing of high resolution / high FPS Video. The second point is, that providing an x86 image would allow people to recycle old Hardware like Thin Clients and stuff. I really prefer small single-board devices over fat old computers, but i think there are some good reasons though... What do you think? BR, Giga
Author
Owner

@kleini commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2019):

The project already provides ready to use images for x86 hardware: https://github.com/ccrisan/motioneye/wiki/Install-In-Docker
Therefore I do not really understand your feature request. Didn't you see yet these ready to use images?

@kleini commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2019): The project already provides ready to use images for x86 hardware: https://github.com/ccrisan/motioneye/wiki/Install-In-Docker Therefore I do not really understand your feature request. Didn't you see yet these ready to use images?
Author
Owner

@Giga-Pudding commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2019):

Hi kleini,

to be honest, i wasn't aware that there is more available than the images listed on this site. I searched for an x86 Image, and came across this page.

I don't know much about docker and virtualization... these aren't images that can be flashed to an flashdrive and then be used to boot from, right?

@Giga-Pudding commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2019): Hi kleini, to be honest, i wasn't aware that there is more available than the images listed [on this site](https://github.com/ccrisan/motioneyeos/wiki/Supported-Devices). I searched for an x86 Image, and came across [this page](https://github.com/ccrisan/motioneye/issues/619). I don't know much about docker and virtualization... these aren't images that can be flashed to an flashdrive and then be used to boot from, right?
Author
Owner

@kleini commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2019):

Then you need to file the request for the motioneyeos project. This is the motioneye project covering only the motioneye software for itself and not any images shipping with the software.

@kleini commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2019): Then you need to file the request for the [motioneyeos](https://github.com/ccrisan/motioneyeos) project. This is the motioneye project covering only the motioneye software for itself and not any images shipping with the software.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/motioneye#1406
No description provided.