mirror of
https://github.com/photoprism/photoprism.git
synced 2026-03-02 22:57:18 -05:00
Import: Create WebDav independent (transport agnostic) version of PHOTOPRISM_AUTO_IMPORT #2467
Labels
No labels
ai
android
api
auth
awesome
bug
bug
ci
cli
config
database
declined
deprecated
docker
docs 📚
documents
duplicate
easy
enhancement
enhancement
enhancement
epic
faces
feedback wanted
frontend
hacktoberfest
help wanted
idea
in-progress
incomplete
index
invalid
ios
labels
live
live
low-priority
macos
member-feature
metadata
mobile
nas
needs-analysis
no-coding-required
no-coding-required
observability
performance
places
please-test
plus-feature
priority
pro-feature
question
raspberry-pi
raw
released
released
released
research
resolved
security
sharing
tested
tests
third-party-issue
thumbnails
upgrade
upstream-issue
ux
vector
video
waiting
won't fix
won't fix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/photoprism#2467
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @kgara on GitHub (Jan 1, 2026).
Confirmation
What Problem Does This Solve and Why Is It Valuable?
Currently PHOTOPRISM_AUTO_IMPORT triggered job only imports the content of the import folder after the WebDAV initiated upload event (correct me if I am wrong).
Actually it seems strange that we don't have it yet. Maybe I don't know some under the hood considerations or something.
What Solution Would You Like?
I think we should make a scheduled auto import feature independent from WebDAV.
E.g. I use separate SCP/SFTP sync to an import folder. And would love to have a scheduled import trigger. I have it now, but as a compromise I am obligated to call REST API import method and hence keep the admin credentials or a token on the host running the REST call job.
What Alternatives Have You Considered?
As an alternative we could also make a separate scope for the tokens limited to import job triggering only or make it authentication less (worst option).
Additional Context
No response