Ctrl clicking on any of the left side items with disable other filters and show only that one #10198

Open
opened 2026-02-21 20:37:18 -05:00 by deekerman · 5 comments
Owner

Originally created by @stephen147 on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020).

As per the title and these images.

Currently activated items

image

Result

image

Originally created by @stephen147 on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020). As per the title and these images. ## Currently activated items ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/14054664/79690722-d2473580-8253-11ea-89b3-b973f5b6a23c.png) ## Result ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/14054664/79690756-f99e0280-8253-11ea-8957-4314d8e600d9.png)
Author
Owner

@FranciscoPombal commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020):

I don't think this is a good idea. Ctrl+click is well-understood in the GUI metaphor to mean "multiple selection" not "deactivate other filters".

@FranciscoPombal commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020): I don't think this is a good idea. Ctrl+click is well-understood in the GUI metaphor to mean "multiple selection" not "deactivate other filters".
Author
Owner

@stephen147 commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020):

Alt click?

@stephen147 commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020): Alt click?
Author
Owner

@FranciscoPombal commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020):

Alt+click usually means "duplicate cursors". In the context of lists I suppose it means the same as Ctrl+click.

@FranciscoPombal commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020): Alt+click usually means "duplicate cursors". In the context of lists I suppose it means the same as Ctrl+click.
Author
Owner

@stephen147 commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020):

Well in that case a context item when right click would be reasonable?

@stephen147 commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020): Well in that case a context item when right click would be reasonable?
Author
Owner

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 24, 2025):

ANNOUNCEMENT!

For anybody coming across this "Feature Request" & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future!
Here are some options available to you:

  1. Please select/click the 👍 &/orreactions in the original/opening post of this ticket.

  2. Please feel free (If you have the "skillset") to create a "Pull Request" implementing what's being requested in this ticket.
    (new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)


DO:

  • Provide constructive feedback.
  • Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc.

DO NOT:

  • Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s).
    (These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)
@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 24, 2025): ## ANNOUNCEMENT! For anybody coming across this **_"Feature Request"_** & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future! **Here are some options available to you:** 1. Please select/click the 👍 **&/or** ❤ `reactions` in the original/opening post of this ticket. 2. Please feel free _(If you have the "skillset")_ to create a **_"Pull Request"_** implementing what's being requested in this ticket. **_(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)_** ____ **DO:** * Provide constructive feedback. * Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc. **DO NOT:** * Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s). **(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)**
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/qBittorrent#10198
No description provided.