Independent RSS feeds refresh timer for each folder #11955

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-21 22:09:14 -05:00 by deekerman · 4 comments

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 22:09:14 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @http403 on GitHub (Apr 1, 2021).

qBittorrent version and Operating System

Windows 10 + QB 4.2.1

What is the problem

I have some quite old RSS feeds that don't update as frequent as the new feeds. Fetching it as frequent as those more active feeds cause waste of resources. It will be nice to lower the number of requests and spread it out in different time to lower both my network and the server load. What I imagine is each feed folder have its own refresh interval, combining with rate limiting #8350 will be great too.

Originally created by @http403 on GitHub (Apr 1, 2021). ### qBittorrent version and Operating System Windows 10 + QB 4.2.1 ### What is the problem I have some quite old RSS feeds that don't update as frequent as the new feeds. Fetching it as frequent as those more active feeds cause waste of resources. It will be nice to lower the number of requests and spread it out in different time to lower both my network and the server load. What I imagine is each feed folder have its own refresh interval, combining with rate limiting #8350 will be great too.

deekerman added the

Feature request

RSS

labels

2026-02-21 22:09:14 -05:00

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 22:09:21 -05:00

Author

Owner

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (Apr 1, 2021):

QB 4.2.1

latest is 4.3.4.1 - please update to that....

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (Apr 1, 2021): >QB 4.2.1 latest is **4.3.4.1** - please update to that....

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 22:09:24 -05:00

Author

Owner

@http403 commented on GitHub (Apr 1, 2021):

Yes. I have noticed. However, as a wish list item, version should not be the most relevant things to consider. Also, I read through change log at every release and no new feature attracts me to update currently. They have bug fixes, but I don't find issues at downloading with 4.2.1, so I'm lazy to do.

@http403 commented on GitHub (Apr 1, 2021): Yes. I have noticed. However, as a wish list item, version should not be the most relevant things to consider. Also, I read through change log at every release and no new feature attracts me to update currently. They have bug fixes, but I don't find issues at downloading with 4.2.1, so I'm lazy to do.

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 22:09:24 -05:00

Author

Owner

@http403 commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2023):

Close as stale

@http403 commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2023): Close as stale

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 22:09:24 -05:00

Author

Owner

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 24, 2025):

ANNOUNCEMENT!

For anybody coming across this "Feature Request" & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future!
Here are some options available to you:

Please select/click the 👍 &/or ❤ reactions in the original/opening post of this ticket.
Please feel free (If you have the "skillset") to create a "Pull Request" implementing what's being requested in this ticket.
(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)

DO:

Provide constructive feedback.
Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc.

DO NOT:

Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s).
(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 24, 2025): ## ANNOUNCEMENT! For anybody coming across this **_"Feature Request"_** & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future! **Here are some options available to you:** 1. Please select/click the 👍 **&/or** ❤ `reactions` in the original/opening post of this ticket. 2. Please feel free _(If you have the "skillset")_ to create a **_"Pull Request"_** implementing what's being requested in this ticket. **_(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)_** ____ **DO:** * Provide constructive feedback. * Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc. **DO NOT:** * Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s). **(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)**