starred/qBittorrent

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent.git synced 2026-03-02 22:57:32 -05:00

Ability to filter HTTP trackers instead of HTTPS via sidebar (where there are filters for Trackerless, Error, etc...) #12296

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-21 22:34:03 -05:00 by deekerman · 6 comments

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 22:34:03 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @AdKiller on GitHub (Jul 29, 2021).

Feature request

Checklist

I have read the feature request section in the contributing guidelines, so I know how to submit a good feature request with the required information
I have verified that the feature I am requesting is not available in the latest version
(optional but recommended) I have verified that the feature I am requesting is not available in the latest CI build
I have checked the frequent/common issues list and searched the issue tracker for similar feature requests (including closed ones) to avoid posting a duplicate
This request is not a support request or question, both of which are better suited for either the discussions section, forum, or subreddit. The wiki did not contain a suitable solution either

Description

Suggestion

In the filter sidebar, where there are filters for Trackerless, Error, etc... add a filter like that but for trackers that use HTTP instead of HTTPS.

Originally created by @AdKiller on GitHub (Jul 29, 2021). # Feature request  ## Checklist  - [x] I have read the **feature request section** in the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md), so I know how to submit a good feature request with the required information - [x] I have verified that the **feature** I am requesting is **not available** in the **[latest version](https://www.qbittorrent.org/download.php)** - [x] (optional but recommended) I have verified that the **feature** I am requesting is **not available** in the **[latest CI build](https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/actions/workflows/ci.yaml?query=branch%3Amaster+event%3Apush)** - [x] I have **checked the [frequent/common issues list](https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/projects/2)** and **searched** the issue tracker for similar feature requests (including closed ones) **to avoid posting a duplicate** - [X] This request is **not a support request or question**, both of which are better suited for either the [discussions section](https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/discussions), [forum](https://qbforums.shiki.hu/), or [subreddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/qBittorrent/). The [wiki](https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/wiki) did not contain a suitable solution either ## Description  ### Suggestion In the filter sidebar, where there are filters for Trackerless, Error, etc... add a filter like that but for trackers that use HTTP instead of HTTPS.

deekerman added the

Feature request

Filters

labels

2026-02-21 22:34:03 -05:00

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 22:34:11 -05:00

Author

Owner

@AdKiller commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2021):

@glassez could you please tell me why this is an invalid request?

@AdKiller commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2021): @glassez could you please tell me why this is an invalid request?

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 22:34:13 -05:00

Author

Owner

@glassez commented on GitHub (Aug 1, 2021):

@glassez could you please tell me why this is an invalid request?

Do you really believe that Filter for torrents with HTTP tracker address. clearly describes to other people what do you want?

@glassez commented on GitHub (Aug 1, 2021): > @glassez could you please tell me why this is an invalid request? Do you really believe that `Filter for torrents with HTTP tracker address.` clearly describes to other people what do you want?

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 22:34:13 -05:00

Author

Owner

@AdKiller commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2021):

@glassez could you please tell me why this is an invalid request?

Do you really believe that Filter for torrents with HTTP tracker address. clearly describes to other people what do you want?

I am talking about the filter sidebar, where there are filters for Trackerless, Error, et... my request is a filter like that but for trackers that use HTTP instead of HTTPS.

Not sure how much more clearly that can be said.

@AdKiller commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2021): > > > > @glassez could you please tell me why this is an invalid request? > > Do you really believe that `Filter for torrents with HTTP tracker address.` clearly describes to other people what do you want? I am talking about the filter sidebar, where there are filters for Trackerless, Error, et... my request is a filter like that but for trackers that use HTTP instead of HTTPS. Not sure how much more clearly that can be said.

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 22:34:13 -05:00

Author

Owner

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2021):

I am talking about the filter sidebar, where there are filters for Trackerless, Error, et... my request is a filter like that but for trackers that use HTTP instead of HTTPS.

That's a bit clearer than your OP!!

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2021): >I am talking about the filter sidebar, where there are filters for Trackerless, Error, et... my request is a filter like that but for trackers that use HTTP instead of HTTPS. That's a bit clearer than your OP!!

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 22:34:13 -05:00

Author

Owner

@AdKiller commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2021):

@glassez could you please tell me why this is an invalid request?

Do you really believe that Filter for torrents with HTTP tracker address. clearly describes to other people what do you want?

Description updated. please consider making it a valid request.

@AdKiller commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2021): > > > > @glassez could you please tell me why this is an invalid request? > > Do you really believe that `Filter for torrents with HTTP tracker address.` clearly describes to other people what do you want? Description updated. please consider making it a valid request.

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 22:34:13 -05:00

Author

Owner

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 24, 2025):

ANNOUNCEMENT!

For anybody coming across this "Feature Request" & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future!
Here are some options available to you:

Please select/click the 👍 &/or ❤ reactions in the original/opening post of this ticket.
Please feel free (If you have the "skillset") to create a "Pull Request" implementing what's being requested in this ticket.
(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)

DO:

Provide constructive feedback.
Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc.

DO NOT:

Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s).
(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 24, 2025): ## ANNOUNCEMENT! For anybody coming across this **_"Feature Request"_** & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future! **Here are some options available to you:** 1. Please select/click the 👍 **&/or** ❤ `reactions` in the original/opening post of this ticket. 2. Please feel free _(If you have the "skillset")_ to create a **_"Pull Request"_** implementing what's being requested in this ticket. **_(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)_** ____ **DO:** * Provide constructive feedback. * Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc. **DO NOT:** * Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s). **(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)**