mirror of
https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent.git
synced 2026-03-02 22:57:32 -05:00
Run external program on torrent METADATA received #14067
Labels
No labels
Accessibility
AppImage
Bounty
Build system
CI
Can't reproduce
Code cleanup
Confirmed bug
Confirmed bug
Core
Crash
Data loss
Discussion
Docker
Documentation
Duplicate
Feature
Feature request
Feature request
Feature request
Filters
Flatpak
GUI
Has workaround
I2P
Invalid
Libtorrent
Look and feel
Meta
NSIS
Network
Not an issue
OS: *BSD
OS: Linux
OS: Windows
OS: macOS
PPA
Performance
Project management
Proxy/VPN
Qt bugs
Qt6 compat
RSS
Search engine
Security
Temp folder
Themes
Translations
Triggers
Waiting diagnosis
Waiting info
Waiting upstream
Waiting web implementation
Watched folders
WebAPI
WebUI
autoCloseOldIssue
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/qBittorrent#14067
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @KayLeung on GitHub (Dec 5, 2022).
Suggestion
On v4.5 has added a feature on torrent added but which is only useful for .torrent files. For magnet links, before METADATA received we have not enough info to make decisions.
Use case
set Torrent Stop Condition to "Metadata received".
when "Metadata received" is true, run an external program to unselect useless files and then start the downloads.
Extra info/examples/attachments
No response
@thalieht commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2022):
@KayLeung commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2022):
@thalieht
Ahh Cool. Thanks for the reminder.
I have an external script to filter the files now. Based on my experience, a simple filename filter does not enough.
e.g. my script has a rule to make decisions based on file sizes
@luzpaz commented on GitHub (Jun 11, 2023):
Related to #18457
@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 24, 2025):
ANNOUNCEMENT!
For anybody coming across this "Feature Request" & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future!
Here are some options available to you:
Please select/click the 👍 &/or ❤
reactionsin the original/opening post of this ticket.Please feel free (If you have the "skillset") to create a "Pull Request" implementing what's being requested in this ticket.
(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)
DO:
DO NOT:
(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)