Custom Status Filters #14394

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-22 01:01:11 -05:00 by deekerman · 1 comment

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 01:01:11 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @AlexMhr on GitHub (Mar 6, 2023).

Suggestion

This is replacement for my previous feature request for a new status filter: https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/issues/18421

I was wondering if instead of a lot of pre-made status filters, could we build our own and (at least optionally) remove the default ones.

eg:

"New Status Filter..."
Display a check list of all existing status words (Seeding, Completed, Paused, etc..)
Check the words you want to include (always OR because no torrent has 2 status assigned at the same time)
3b) Each status word would also need options to include "Stalled" or "Transferring" to recapture existing default status filters ;-)
Name the Filter (perhaps pick an icon but doesn't matter)

Done.

I ask because, respectfully, the current status-filter system is cluttered and mostly un-useful. Does anyone even use half of these filters?

This would clean it up / streamline it - every user controls their own environment per their own preferences.

Thanks for your consideration.

Use case

No response

Extra info/examples/attachments

No response

Originally created by @AlexMhr on GitHub (Mar 6, 2023). ### Suggestion This is replacement for my previous feature request for a new status filter: [https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/issues/18421](https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/issues/18421) I was wondering if instead of a lot of pre-made status filters, could we build our own and (at least optionally) remove the default ones. eg: 1) "New Status Filter..." 2) Display a check list of all existing status words (Seeding, Completed, Paused, etc..) 3) Check the words you want to include (always OR because no torrent has 2 status assigned at the same time) 3b) Each status word would also need options to include "Stalled" or "Transferring" to recapture existing default status filters ;-) 4) Name the Filter (perhaps pick an icon but doesn't matter) Done. I ask because, respectfully, the current status-filter system is cluttered and mostly un-useful. Does anyone even use half of these filters? This would clean it up / streamline it - every user controls their own environment per their own preferences. Thanks for your consideration. ### Use case _No response_ ### Extra info/examples/attachments _No response_

deekerman added the

Feature request

Filters

labels

2026-02-22 01:01:11 -05:00

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 01:01:20 -05:00

Author

Owner

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 25, 2025):

ANNOUNCEMENT!

For anybody coming across this "Feature Request" & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future!
Here are some options available to you:

Please select/click the 👍 &/or ❤ reactions in the original/opening post of this ticket.
Please feel free (If you have the "skillset") to create a "Pull Request" implementing what's being requested in this ticket.
(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)

DO:

Provide constructive feedback.
Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc.

DO NOT:

Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s).
(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 25, 2025): ## ANNOUNCEMENT! For anybody coming across this **_"Feature Request"_** & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future! **Here are some options available to you:** 1. Please select/click the 👍 **&/or** ❤ `reactions` in the original/opening post of this ticket. 2. Please feel free _(If you have the "skillset")_ to create a **_"Pull Request"_** implementing what's being requested in this ticket. **_(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)_** ____ **DO:** * Provide constructive feedback. * Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc. **DO NOT:** * Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s). **(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)**

deekerman referenced this issue

2026-02-22 03:41:46 -05:00

Sort by file piece position on content tab #17144