starred/qBittorrent

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent.git synced 2026-03-02 22:57:32 -05:00

Selection ability on per torrent basis #14676

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-22 01:18:54 -05:00 by deekerman · 5 comments

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 01:18:54 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @absolutep on GitHub (Jun 5, 2023).

Suggestion

I would like to request the ability to select torrent's mode - i.e., I2P-Only or Mixed Mode, for per torrent basis.

Use case

Let's assume a hypothetical scenario, where a user has 100 torrents and he wants to -

Seed 40 torrents to I2P-Only & rest to Mixed mode.
Seed 20 torrents to I2P-Only, 40 Torrents to Public-Only & 40 Torrents to Mixed Mode.

Extra info/examples/attachments

Example screenshot given below

Originally created by @absolutep on GitHub (Jun 5, 2023). ### Suggestion I would like to request the ability to select torrent's mode - i.e., I2P-Only or Mixed Mode, for per torrent basis. ### Use case Let's assume a hypothetical scenario, where a user has 100 torrents and he wants to - 1) Seed 40 torrents to I2P-Only & rest to Mixed mode. 2) Seed 20 torrents to I2P-Only, 40 Torrents to Public-Only & 40 Torrents to Mixed Mode. ### Extra info/examples/attachments Example screenshot given below ![Untitled](https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/assets/97702149/c28d0ce2-794b-4885-b792-73f9056a9dd9)

deekerman added the

labels

2026-02-22 01:18:54 -05:00

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 01:19:04 -05:00

Author

Owner

@luzpaz commented on GitHub (Jun 24, 2023):

Is there an upstream ticket ?

@luzpaz commented on GitHub (Jun 24, 2023): Is there an upstream ticket ?

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 01:19:04 -05:00

Author

Owner

@anikey-from-i2p commented on GitHub (Jan 10, 2025):

One possible solution:

create 3 different profiles, one with i2p-only, another with mixed, another with clearnet-only
configure them appropriately
add the torrents
start them when you want to

You can even put them inside sandboxes to further isolate them.

@anikey-from-i2p commented on GitHub (Jan 10, 2025): One possible solution: - create 3 different profiles, one with i2p-only, another with mixed, another with clearnet-only - configure them appropriately - add the torrents - start them when you want to You can even put them inside sandboxes to further isolate them.

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 01:19:04 -05:00

Author

Owner

@Neustradamus commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2025):

@luzpaz: libtorrent issue is here:

https://github.com/arvidn/libtorrent/issues/7461

@Neustradamus commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2025): @luzpaz: libtorrent issue is here: - https://github.com/arvidn/libtorrent/issues/7461

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 01:19:04 -05:00

Author

Owner

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 25, 2025):

ANNOUNCEMENT!

For anybody coming across this "Feature Request" & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future!
Here are some options available to you:

Please select/click the 👍 &/or ❤ reactions in the original/opening post of this ticket.
Please feel free (If you have the "skillset") to create a "Pull Request" implementing what's being requested in this ticket.
(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)

DO:

Provide constructive feedback.
Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc.

DO NOT:

Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s).
(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 25, 2025): ## ANNOUNCEMENT! For anybody coming across this **_"Feature Request"_** & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future! **Here are some options available to you:** 1. Please select/click the 👍 **&/or** ❤ `reactions` in the original/opening post of this ticket. 2. Please feel free _(If you have the "skillset")_ to create a **_"Pull Request"_** implementing what's being requested in this ticket. **_(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)_** ____ **DO:** * Provide constructive feedback. * Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc. **DO NOT:** * Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s). **(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)**

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 01:19:04 -05:00

Author

Owner

@absolutep commented on GitHub (Sep 13, 2025):

Any update on this regard?
BiglyBT [3.9] and Tixati [3.38] both have this facility.

@absolutep commented on GitHub (Sep 13, 2025): Any update on this regard? BiglyBT [3.9] and Tixati [3.38] both have this facility.