Option to Disable automatic file check at startup #16097

Open
opened 2026-02-22 02:47:47 -05:00 by deekerman · 13 comments
Owner

Originally created by @bibsp on GitHub (Sep 29, 2024).

Originally assigned to: @glassez on GitHub.

Suggestion

I have recently switched from utorrent. This app is fantastic. The only thing I hate about is, whenever I move my downloaded files to other location, it gives this missing files error. I don't like this behaviour.

After 100% download, I stopped seeding. Then I move the file. There is no point of automatically searching for file.

See, if I move file, then accidentally click on start, then it should show missing file error. Other than that why does it search for file? It's pointless. This looks so bad.

Use case

No response

Extra info/examples/attachments

No response

Originally created by @bibsp on GitHub (Sep 29, 2024). Originally assigned to: @glassez on GitHub. ### Suggestion I have recently switched from utorrent. This app is fantastic. The only thing I hate about is, whenever I move my downloaded files to other location, it gives this missing files error. I don't like this behaviour. After 100% download, I stopped seeding. Then I move the file. There is no point of automatically searching for file. See, if I move file, then accidentally click on start, then it should show missing file error. Other than that why does it search for file? It's pointless. This looks so bad. ### Use case _No response_ ### Extra info/examples/attachments _No response_
Author
Owner

@qBittUser commented on GitHub (Sep 29, 2024):

@bibsp

...whenever I move my downloaded files to other location, it gives this missing files error.

Are you using something else to move files instead of qBittorrent built-in options?

@qBittUser commented on GitHub (Sep 29, 2024): @bibsp > ...whenever I move my downloaded files to other location, it gives this missing files error. Are you using something else to move files instead of qBittorrent built-in options?
Author
Owner

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Sep 29, 2024):

Windows file explorer.

As i already mentioned, before doing this I paused the torrent. Then move the file/folder from download folder to different drive.

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Sep 29, 2024): Windows file explorer. As i already mentioned, before doing this I paused the torrent. Then move the file/folder from download folder to different drive.
Author
Owner

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024):

Screenshot (58)
This is how it shows. All these errors are actually 100% downloaded files. Few are moved to different drive. Few are deleted. This is super annoying to see. utorrent was not like this.

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024): ![Screenshot (58)](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e71933b6-90e5-493c-9fc7-a2c77bffadbe) This is how it shows. All these errors are actually 100% downloaded files. Few are moved to different drive. Few are deleted. This is super annoying to see. utorrent was not like this.
Author
Owner

@HanabishiRecca commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024):

It doesn't really make sense to me. If files are not there, showing the Missing Files message is totally logical, regardless of the torrent status. Yes, I think uTorrent does it wrong and would call it a bug there.

In fact, some people want exactly the opposite:


Anyway, if you deleted/moved the files and do not intend to seed further, then why you want to keep the task?

@HanabishiRecca commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024): It doesn't really make sense to me. If files are not there, showing the `Missing Files` message is totally logical, regardless of the torrent status. Yes, I think uTorrent does it wrong and would call it a bug there. In fact, some people want exactly the opposite: * #18822 --- Anyway, if you deleted/moved the files and do not intend to seed further, then why you want to keep the task?
Author
Owner

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024):

showing the Missing Files message is totally logical

Atleast give option to disable it.

Anyway, if you deleted/moved the files and do not intend to seed further, then why you want to keep the task?

I want to keep my download history.

It's not a huge deal to give a small option to disable this. Please consider the request.

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024): > showing the `Missing Files` message is totally logical Atleast give option to disable it. > Anyway, if you deleted/moved the files and do not intend to seed further, then why you want to keep the task? I want to keep my download history. It's not a huge deal to give a small option to disable this. Please consider the request.
Author
Owner

@thalieht commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024):

Duplicate of #11878

@thalieht commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024): Duplicate of #11878
Author
Owner

@glassez commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2024):

I intend to add the ability to skip checking files for stopped torrents (at least optionally) in v5.1 release.

It's not a huge deal to give a small option to disable this.

It's actually not as easy as you think.

@glassez commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2024): I intend to add the ability to skip checking files for stopped torrents (at least optionally) in v5.1 release. > It's not a huge deal to give a small option to disable this. It's actually not as easy as you think.
Author
Owner

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2024):

Okay... 😒
I'm just hoping anyone will implement it in future.
Thanks everyone.

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2024): Okay... 😒 I'm just hoping anyone will implement it in future. Thanks everyone.
Author
Owner

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024):

Can it be reopend? It was closed on 30 Sept. Later it was added to 5.1 milestone on 3 Oct.

Because in 5.1 milestone it's under closed section, glassez might forget about it.

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024): Can it be reopend? It was closed on 30 Sept. Later it was added to 5.1 milestone on 3 Oct. Because in 5.1 milestone it's under closed section, **glassez** might forget about it.
Author
Owner

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Apr 15, 2025):

@glassez Any plan for this? I was really waiting for this feature. Now I see you removed from 5.1 release.

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Apr 15, 2025): @glassez Any plan for this? I was really waiting for this feature. Now I see you removed from 5.1 release.
Author
Owner

@glassez commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2025):

@glassez Any plan for this?

Yes. I still intend implementing it. But this requires a deeper redesign of the core code in order to be implemented properly. So it's on hold until then.

@glassez commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2025): > [@glassez](https://github.com/glassez) Any plan for this? Yes. I still intend implementing it. But this requires a deeper redesign of the core code in order to be implemented properly. So it's on hold until then.
Author
Owner

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2025):

Thanks for your reply. Please do whenever you have time. This is the only thing that is preventing me to switch to qbittorrent. I actually want to switch from utorrent to qbittorrent.

@bibsp commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2025): Thanks for your reply. Please do whenever you have time. This is the only thing that is preventing me to switch to qbittorrent. I actually want to switch from utorrent to qbittorrent.
Author
Owner

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 25, 2025):

ANNOUNCEMENT!

For anybody coming across this "Feature Request" & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future!
Here are some options available to you:

  1. Please select/click the 👍 &/orreactions in the original/opening post of this ticket.

  2. Please feel free (If you have the "skillset") to create a "Pull Request" implementing what's being requested in this ticket.
    (new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)


DO:

  • Provide constructive feedback.
  • Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc.

DO NOT:

  • Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s).
    (These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)
@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 25, 2025): ## ANNOUNCEMENT! For anybody coming across this **_"Feature Request"_** & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future! **Here are some options available to you:** 1. Please select/click the 👍 **&/or** ❤ `reactions` in the original/opening post of this ticket. 2. Please feel free _(If you have the "skillset")_ to create a **_"Pull Request"_** implementing what's being requested in this ticket. **_(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)_** ____ **DO:** * Provide constructive feedback. * Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc. **DO NOT:** * Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s). **(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)**
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/qBittorrent#16097
No description provided.