Option to check label folders and check for scattered files #171

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-21 14:55:10 -05:00 by deekerman · 1 comment

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 14:55:10 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @nivensd on GitHub (Oct 31, 2012).

Given both of my previous issues (#150 & #160), it would be nice if there was an option (not a default, as it would slow things down) for force recheck to check all existing label folders (in addition to the incomplete and complete folders [related to #160]) as well as checking for files that got scattered by previous versions of qBittorrent [related to #150].

Originally created by @nivensd on GitHub (Oct 31, 2012). Given both of my previous issues (#150 & #160), it would be nice if there was an option (not a default, as it would slow things down) for force recheck to check all existing label folders (in addition to the incomplete and complete folders [related to #160]) as well as checking for files that got scattered by previous versions of qBittorrent [related to #150].

deekerman added the

Feature request

label

2026-02-21 14:55:10 -05:00

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 14:55:15 -05:00

Author

Owner

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 23, 2025):

ANNOUNCEMENT!

For anybody coming across this "Feature Request" & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future!
Here are some options available to you:

Please select/click the 👍 &/or ❤ reactions in the original/opening post of this ticket.
Please feel free (If you have the "skillset") to create a "Pull Request" implementing what's being requested in this ticket.
(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)

DO:

Provide constructive feedback.
Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc.

DO NOT:

Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s).
(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 23, 2025): ## ANNOUNCEMENT! For anybody coming across this **_"Feature Request"_** & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future! **Here are some options available to you:** 1. Please select/click the 👍 **&/or** ❤ `reactions` in the original/opening post of this ticket. 2. Please feel free _(If you have the "skillset")_ to create a **_"Pull Request"_** implementing what's being requested in this ticket. **_(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)_** ____ **DO:** * Provide constructive feedback. * Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc. **DO NOT:** * Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s). **(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)**