starred/qBittorrent

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent.git synced 2026-03-02 22:57:32 -05:00

ERROR - Movie file and Force Recheck file, no there is no indicator #17118

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-22 03:41:04 -05:00 by deekerman · 8 comments

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 03:41:04 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @l-n0-0b on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025).

Suggestion

v5.1.2
Arch Linux (Flatpak)
Xorg11
The theme from the system and custom icons are disabled.

Use case

When selecting several lines, for example 4, the movement indicator does not show (and sometimes checks, too).
There is a limit of 2 - for verification.
Is it possible to equate the limitation of the number of checks to the number of movements?
It's even worse when queues are enabled.
Why not move all the selected ones at once?

Extra info/examples/attachments

No response

Originally created by @l-n0-0b on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025). ### Suggestion v5.1.2 Arch Linux (Flatpak) Xorg11 The theme from the system and custom icons are disabled. ### Use case When selecting several lines, for example 4, the movement indicator does not show (and sometimes checks, too). There is a limit of 2 - for verification. Is it possible to equate the limitation of the number of checks to the number of movements? It's even worse when queues are enabled. Why not move all the selected ones at once? ### Extra info/examples/attachments _No response_

deekerman added the

Flatpak

label

2026-02-22 03:41:04 -05:00

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 03:41:07 -05:00

Author

Owner

@thalieht commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025):

I don't understand either of your issues (the other #23171).

@thalieht commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025): I don't understand either of your issues (the other #23171).

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 03:41:07 -05:00

Author

Owner

@luzpaz commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025):

@l-n0-0b very difficult to understand this ticket. It needs screenshots and more elaboration.

@luzpaz commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025): @l-n0-0b very difficult to understand this ticket. It needs screenshots and more elaboration.

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 03:41:07 -05:00

Author

Owner

@l-n0-0b commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025):

@l-n0-0b very difficult to understand this ticket. It needs screenshots and more elaboration.

Are there no synonyms in English? (words similar in meaning). Why did everyone suddenly stop understanding?

You don't understand what is in your program's interface and where, so as not to guess?
Good. I'm spelling out the names. "Table - right mouse button" - "Force Recheck".
Sometimes the "Force Recheck" progress bar is not displayed - 1% -100%...
I have "Maximum active checking - (2)" in my settings.
And there is also "Table - right mouse button" - ""Set location"".
The progress bar (movement) of 1%-100% is also not displayed.
Is it possible to add a "Maximum ""Set location"" - (2)"" when moving, so that with a large number of allocations, it is done one at a time so as not to create an increased load on the disk - and everything does not freeze stop programs.
It's impossible to spend so much time moving one piece at a time.

@l-n0-0b commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025): > [@l-n0-0b](https://github.com/l-n0-0b) very difficult to understand this ticket. It needs screenshots and more elaboration. Are there no synonyms in English? (words similar in meaning). Why did everyone suddenly stop understanding? You don't understand what is in your program's interface and where, so as not to guess? Good. I'm spelling out the names. "Table - right mouse button" - "Force Recheck". Sometimes the "Force Recheck" progress bar is not displayed - 1% -100%... I have "Maximum active checking - (2)" in my settings. And there is also "Table - right mouse button" - ""Set location"". The progress bar (movement) of 1%-100% is also not displayed. Is it possible to add a "Maximum ""Set location"" - (2)"" when moving, so that with a large number of allocations, it is done one at a time so as not to create an increased load on the disk - and everything does not freeze stop programs. It's impossible to spend so much time moving one piece at a time.

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 03:41:07 -05:00

Author

Owner

@thalieht commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2025):

Sometimes the "Force Recheck" progress bar is not displayed - 1% -100%...

Can't reproduce.

The progress bar (movement) of 1%-100% is also not displayed.

Not implemented. See #508

Is it possible to add a "Maximum ""Set location"" - (2)"" when moving, so that with a large number of allocations, it is done one at a time so as not to create an increased load on the disk - and everything does not freeze stop programs.

There's supposed to be a moving queue with one torrent at a time being moved but i don't know how to test it. Maybe you just saw "Moving" status on your torrents and you assumed they're all moving simultaneously?

@thalieht commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2025): >Sometimes the "Force Recheck" progress bar is not displayed - 1% -100%... Can't reproduce. >The progress bar (movement) of 1%-100% is also not displayed. Not implemented. See #508 >Is it possible to add a "Maximum ""Set location"" - (2)"" when moving, so that with a large number of allocations, it is done one at a time so as not to create an increased load on the disk - and everything does not freeze stop programs. There's supposed to be a moving queue with one torrent at a time being moved but i don't know how to test it. Maybe you just saw "Moving" status on your torrents and you assumed they're all moving simultaneously?

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 03:41:07 -05:00

Author

Owner

@l-n0-0b commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2025):

Can't reproduce.
the process is ongoing, but always 100% and 0% (there is no strip - there is no progress bar). It's not clear if it's running - sometimes it feels like everything is frozen.

It happens rarely, but aptly. Especially if you add a check one at a time, you have to repeat it a lot. At some point, it stops doing or showing. This is especially true when a check is already running, or a lot of checks are running, or there are a lot of downloads. There is nothing written about this in the log (in the interface).

There's supposed to be a moving queue with one torrent at a time being moved but i don't know how to test it. Maybe you just saw "Moving" status on your torrents and you assumed they're all moving simultaneously?

Yes, everyone is moving in the list. What I saw in the program is what I'm saying, do they move one at a time? Because if you select a lot at once (or select one after the other) - by braking and eventually by freezing the program - it feels like everyone is moving at once (maybe you can set this up somewhere?) So, I ran it on 2 different disks at once, both under 100% load.

@l-n0-0b commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2025): > Can't reproduce. the process is ongoing, but always 100% and 0% (there is no strip - there is no progress bar). It's not clear if it's running - sometimes it feels like everything is frozen. It happens rarely, but aptly. Especially if you add a check one at a time, you have to repeat it a lot. At some point, it stops doing or showing. This is especially true when a check is already running, or a lot of checks are running, or there are a lot of downloads. There is nothing written about this in the log (in the interface). > There's supposed to be a moving queue with one torrent at a time being moved but i don't know how to test it. Maybe you just saw "Moving" status on your torrents and you assumed they're all moving simultaneously? Yes, everyone is moving in the list. What I saw in the program is what I'm saying, do they move one at a time? Because if you select a lot at once (or select one after the other) - by braking and eventually by freezing the program - it feels like everyone is moving at once (maybe you can set this up somewhere?) So, I ran it on 2 different disks at once, both under 100% load. <img width="222" height="54" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eb388ec1-07f9-4f1b-964d-81b97bb7ea5e" /> <img width="230" height="328" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8ef3059f-efe8-4b5b-8228-d3152857f8a1" />

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 03:41:07 -05:00

Author

Owner

@l-n0-0b commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025):

Sometimes the "Force Recheck" progress bar is not displayed - 1% -100%...

It down and moves at the same time.
And this, how does it happen?

@l-n0-0b commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025): > > Sometimes the "Force Recheck" progress bar is not displayed - 1% -100%... <img width="620" height="19" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2a034668-881b-46a5-9271-e4ed3ca84124" /> It down and moves at the same time. And this, how does it happen?

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 03:41:07 -05:00

Author

Owner

@l-n0-0b commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025):

Sometimes the "Force Recheck" progress bar is not displayed - 1% -100%...

Can't reproduce.

The progress bar (movement) of 1%-100% is also not displayed.

Not implemented. See #508

Is it possible to add a "Maximum ""Set location"" - (2)"" when moving, so that with a large number of allocations, it is done one at a time so as not to create an increased load on the disk - and everything does not freeze stop programs.

There's supposed to be a moving queue with one torrent at a time being moved but i don't know how to test it. Maybe you just saw "Moving" status on your torrents and you assumed they're all moving simultaneously?

I ran it through the terminal and there are these lines, but I do not know at what point they came - there is no indication of the time.

`Failed to load module "xapp-gtk3-module"`
**this line was just at the beginning, the rest later.**

QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified
QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified
QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified
QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified
edit: editing failed
edit: editing failed
edit: editing failed
edit: editing failed
edit: editing failed
QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified
QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified
edit: editing failed
edit: editing failed

@l-n0-0b commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025): > > Sometimes the "Force Recheck" progress bar is not displayed - 1% -100%... > > Can't reproduce. > > > The progress bar (movement) of 1%-100% is also not displayed. > > Not implemented. See [#508](https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/issues/508) > > > Is it possible to add a "Maximum ""Set location"" - (2)"" when moving, so that with a large number of allocations, it is done one at a time so as not to create an increased load on the disk - and everything does not freeze stop programs. > > There's supposed to be a moving queue with one torrent at a time being moved but i don't know how to test it. Maybe you just saw "Moving" status on your torrents and you assumed they're all moving simultaneously? I ran it through the terminal and there are these lines, but I do not know at what point they came - there is no indication of the time. ``` `Failed to load module "xapp-gtk3-module"` **this line was just at the beginning, the rest later.** QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified edit: editing failed edit: editing failed edit: editing failed edit: editing failed edit: editing failed QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified edit: editing failed edit: editing failed ```

deekerman commented

2026-02-22 03:41:07 -05:00

Author

Owner

@l-n0-0b commented on GitHub (Sep 2, 2025):

Sometimes the "Force Recheck" progress bar is not displayed - 1% -100%...

Can't reproduce.

The progress bar (movement) of 1%-100% is also not displayed.

Not implemented. See #508

Is it possible to add a "Maximum ""Set location"" - (2)"" when moving, so that with a large number of allocations, it is done one at a time so as not to create an increased load on the disk - and everything does not freeze stop programs.

There's supposed to be a moving queue with one torrent at a time being moved but i don't know how to test it. Maybe you just saw "Moving" status on your torrents and you assumed they're all moving simultaneously?

but qbit can't do more than literally 1-2 tasks with files.
As a result, the NTFS file system is not particularly related to the problem.

@l-n0-0b commented on GitHub (Sep 2, 2025): > > Sometimes the "Force Recheck" progress bar is not displayed - 1% -100%... > > Can't reproduce. > > > The progress bar (movement) of 1%-100% is also not displayed. > > Not implemented. See [#508](https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/issues/508) > > > Is it possible to add a "Maximum ""Set location"" - (2)"" when moving, so that with a large number of allocations, it is done one at a time so as not to create an increased load on the disk - and everything does not freeze stop programs. > > There's supposed to be a moving queue with one torrent at a time being moved but i don't know how to test it. Maybe you just saw "Moving" status on your torrents and you assumed they're all moving simultaneously? but qbit can't do more than literally 1-2 tasks with files. As a result, the NTFS file system is not particularly related to the problem.