Choose Priority of RSS Feeds #9720

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-21 20:20:53 -05:00 by deekerman · 1 comment

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 20:20:53 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @EthicalDeviant on GitHub (Feb 2, 2020).

Please provide the following information

qBittorrent version and Operating System

v4.2.1 Windows 10 Pro

If on linux, libtorrent-rasterbar and Qt version

N/A

What is the problem

N/A

What is the expected behavior

N/A

Steps to reproduce

N/A

Extra info(if any)

I would like the option of making torrents added from RSS Feeds Top Priority in Download Queue. In other words, if I have 3-4 files downloading and then my RSS Feed picks up something I've been watching and waiting for, it will make that newly added torrent from RSS #1 in the download queue and begin downloading immediately.

Originally created by @EthicalDeviant on GitHub (Feb 2, 2020). **Please provide the following information** ### qBittorrent version and Operating System v4.2.1 Windows 10 Pro ### If on linux, libtorrent-rasterbar and Qt version N/A ### What is the problem N/A ### What is the expected behavior N/A ### Steps to reproduce N/A ### Extra info(if any) I would like the option of making torrents added from RSS Feeds Top Priority in Download Queue. In other words, if I have 3-4 files downloading and then my RSS Feed picks up something I've been watching and waiting for, it will make that newly added torrent from RSS #1 in the download queue and begin downloading immediately.

deekerman added the

Feature request

RSS

labels

2026-02-21 20:20:53 -05:00

deekerman commented

2026-02-21 20:20:56 -05:00

Author

Owner

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 24, 2025):

ANNOUNCEMENT!

For anybody coming across this "Feature Request" & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future!
Here are some options available to you:

Please select/click the 👍 &/or ❤ reactions in the original/opening post of this ticket.
Please feel free (If you have the "skillset") to create a "Pull Request" implementing what's being requested in this ticket.
(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)

DO:

Provide constructive feedback.
Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc.

DO NOT:

Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s).
(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)

@xavier2k6 commented on GitHub (May 24, 2025): ## ANNOUNCEMENT! For anybody coming across this **_"Feature Request"_** & would like/love to see a potential implementation in the future! **Here are some options available to you:** 1. Please select/click the 👍 **&/or** ❤ `reactions` in the original/opening post of this ticket. 2. Please feel free _(If you have the "skillset")_ to create a **_"Pull Request"_** implementing what's being requested in this ticket. **_(new/existing contributors/developers are always welcome)_** ____ **DO:** * Provide constructive feedback. * Display how other projects implemented same/similar etc. **DO NOT:** * Add a "Bump", "me too", "2nd/3rd" etc. or "criticizing" comment(s). **(These will be disregarded/hidden as "spam/abuse/off-topic" etc. as they don't provide anything constructive.)**