mirror of
https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma.git
synced 2026-03-02 22:57:00 -05:00
Release docker images on ghcr registry #1678
Labels
No labels
A:accessibility
A:api
A:cert-expiry
A:core
A:dashboard
A:deployment
A:documentation
A:domain expiry
A:incidents
A:maintenance
A:metrics
A:monitor
A:notifications
A:reports
A:settings
A:status-page
A:ui/ux
A:user-management
Stale
ai-slop
blocked
blocked-upstream
bug
cannot-reproduce
dependencies
discussion
duplicate
feature-request
feature-request
good first issue
hacktoberfest
help
help wanted
house keeping
invalid
invalid-format
invalid-format
question
releaseblocker 🚨
security
spam
type:enhance-existing
type:new
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/uptime-kuma#1678
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @ksurl on GitHub (Dec 24, 2022).
⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.
🏷️ Feature Request Type
Other
🔖 Feature description
Consider release of the docker images on the github container registry as an alternative/backup to docker hub due to free/anonymous account pull limits
✔️ Solution
tag new builds with ghcr.io/louislam/uptime-kuma in addition to the existing implicit docker.io tag and push to ghcr.
❓ Alternatives
No response
📝 Additional Context
No response
@pascaliske commented on GitHub (Mar 10, 2023):
This is an easy feature! Also would be awesome if builds / pushes could be automated using GitHub Actions or some other CI provider...
@ksurl commented on GitHub (Jun 18, 2023):
Is this planned for future releases or can this issue be closed?
@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jun 18, 2023):
This issue is a duplicate of #53.
Please refrain from posting duplicates, as this just makes issue managemnt harder.
See https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/pull/213.
Louis is not keen on this
⇒ Given that he is the BDFL and the only maintainer (see https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/pull/1349, this is by coice), this likely won't happen.
@ksurl commented on GitHub (Jun 18, 2023):
Fair enough but it was not marked as dupe 6 months ago. I'll go ahead and close this.