Dependencies, silence alerts if spefic host is offline #1686

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-28 02:29:26 -05:00 by deekerman · 2 comments

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 02:29:26 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @ithakaa on GitHub (Dec 26, 2022).

⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.

I checked and didn't find similar feature request

🏷️ Feature Request Type

Other

🔖 Feature description

It would be a good idea to include a dependency feature that will silence hosts notification if a specific host is offline

As an example, I am monitoring my modem from a remote location, if my modem is offline, don't send notifications for other hosts inside my network, these notifications are not required

Thanks

✔️ Solution

host dependency

❓ Alternatives

No response

📝 Additional Context

No response

Originally created by @ithakaa on GitHub (Dec 26, 2022). ### ⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before. - [X] I checked and didn't find similar feature request ### 🏷️ Feature Request Type Other ### 🔖 Feature description It would be a good idea to include a dependency feature that will silence hosts notification if a specific host is offline As an example, I am monitoring my modem from a remote location, if my modem is offline, don't send notifications for other hosts inside my network, these notifications are not required Thanks ### ✔️ Solution host dependency ### ❓ Alternatives _No response_ ### 📝 Additional Context _No response_

deekerman

2026-02-28 02:29:26 -05:00

closed this issue
added the
feature-request

A:monitor
labels

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 02:29:31 -05:00

Author

Owner

@skaempfe commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2022):

Please see #1236

@skaempfe commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2022): Please see #1236

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 02:29:33 -05:00

Author

Owner

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2023):

@ithakaa
We are consolidating duplicate issues a bit to make issue management easier.
I think, we should track this issue in https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/1089 https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/2487 #3387 as there is no functional difference (the approach here is slightly different, but can still be covered by the linked issus)
⇒ I am going to close this as a duplicate.

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2023): @ithakaa We are consolidating duplicate issues a bit to make issue management easier. I think, we should track this issue in https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/1089 https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/2487 #3387 as there is no functional difference (the approach here is slightly different, but can still be covered by the linked issus) ⇒ I am going to close this as a duplicate.