starred/uptime-kuma

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma.git synced 2026-03-02 22:57:00 -05:00

improve status page #2214

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-28 02:46:46 -05:00 by deekerman · 7 comments

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 02:46:46 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @enzofoucaud on GitHub (May 26, 2023).

⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.

I checked and didn't find similar feature request

🏷️ Feature Request Type

UI Feature

🔖 Feature description

It would be nice to improve the status page to look something like this.

Example:
https://status.multiversx.com/
https://status.multiversx.com/uptime

✔️ Solution

Improved UX + added API info?

❓ Alternatives

No response

📝 Additional Context

No response

Originally created by @enzofoucaud on GitHub (May 26, 2023). ### ⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before. - [X] I checked and didn't find similar feature request ### 🏷️ Feature Request Type UI Feature ### 🔖 Feature description It would be nice to improve the status page to look something like this. Example: https://status.multiversx.com/ https://status.multiversx.com/uptime ### ✔️ Solution Improved UX + added API info? ### ❓ Alternatives _No response_ ### 📝 Additional Context _No response_

deekerman

2026-02-28 02:46:46 -05:00

closed this issue
added the
feature-request

A:status-page
labels

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 02:46:54 -05:00

Author

Owner

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (May 26, 2023):

Why? What is better?
Please edit your Issue to be more specific.

Also note that some features of atlasian (subscribtion, kalendar display options, mutli-step-incidents) are tracked in other issues. Creating duplicate isssues is creatates more work for everybody

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (May 26, 2023): Why? What is better? Please edit your Issue to be more specific. ![image](https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/assets/26258709/3f1e18f8-51d1-4e6b-9b3e-75d9852f037a) Also note that some features of atlasian (subscribtion, kalendar display options, mutli-step-incidents) are tracked in other issues. Creating duplicate isssues is creatates more work for everybody

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 02:46:54 -05:00

Author

Owner

@enzofoucaud commented on GitHub (May 31, 2023):

Yes, sorry, I could have been more specific in my request.

What I like about Atlassian is the little extra details, such as uptime over the last X days, info on why you've lost connections by moving your mouse over the various points, see past incidents at the bottom of the page, add a uptime page, etc

@enzofoucaud commented on GitHub (May 31, 2023): Yes, sorry, I could have been more specific in my request. What I like about Atlassian is the little extra details, such as uptime over the last X days, info on why you've lost connections by moving your mouse over the various points, see past incidents at the bottom of the page, add a uptime page, etc

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 02:46:54 -05:00

Author

Owner

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (May 31, 2023):

Please open one feature request per feature request and do a duplication search for each of them. (for example for the detialed incidents, see the duplicates mentioned in #1253)
Like you wrote the issue, this is not manageable, given the number of issues.

Furthermore, please be more specific about why you want this feature and why this information would be important for you.

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (May 31, 2023): Please open one feature request per feature request and do a duplication search for each of them. (for example for the detialed incidents, see the duplicates mentioned in #1253) Like you wrote the issue, this is not manageable, given the number of issues. Furthermore, please be more specific about why you want this feature and why this information would be important for you.

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 02:46:54 -05:00

Author

Owner

@shdf2 commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2023):

Sorry to hijack this request :)

in the status page, what about displaying a detailed view when we click on a monitor. Actualy when we click on a monitor nothing happens, so we could have the detailed view like in the dahsboard, when we are logged in.
This shouldn't be hard to implement as the pages already exists.

in case I'm not clear, I'm talking about this view (of course without the buttons edit/delete etc...)

@shdf2 commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2023): Sorry to hijack this request :) in the status page, what about displaying a detailed view **when we click on a monitor**. Actualy when we click on a monitor nothing happens, so we could have the detailed view like in the dahsboard, when we are logged in. This shouldn't be hard to implement as the pages already exists. in case I'm not clear, I'm talking about this view (of course without the buttons edit/delete etc...) ![image](https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/assets/37487684/40a9651b-9e01-4706-b415-dbf2018e4436)

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 02:46:54 -05:00

Author

Owner

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2023):

Sorry to hijack this request

@shdf2
Please open another issue. Like this, this is indeed unmanagable.
Also, please run a duplication search, there may be issues which are very close.

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2023): > Sorry to hijack this request @shdf2 Please open another issue. Like this, this is indeed unmanagable. Also, please run a duplication search, there may be issues which are very close.

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 02:46:54 -05:00

Author

Owner

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jun 13, 2023):

@enzofoucaud
Like you wrote the issue, submitting non-detailed feature-requests this is not manageable, given the number of issues.
Could you close this issue and reopen single-issue feature-reuqests instead? (only you or Louis can close this issue)

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jun 13, 2023): @enzofoucaud Like you wrote the issue, submitting non-detailed `feature-requests` this is not manageable, given the number of issues. Could you close this issue and reopen single-issue `feature-reuqests` instead? (only you or Louis can close this issue)

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 02:46:54 -05:00

Author

Owner

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jun 13, 2023):

❤️

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jun 13, 2023): ❤️