mirror of
https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma.git
synced 2026-03-02 22:57:00 -05:00
Create multiple users and AD\LDAP authorization #2648
Labels
No labels
A:accessibility
A:api
A:cert-expiry
A:core
A:dashboard
A:deployment
A:documentation
A:domain expiry
A:incidents
A:maintenance
A:metrics
A:monitor
A:notifications
A:reports
A:settings
A:status-page
A:ui/ux
A:user-management
Stale
ai-slop
blocked
blocked-upstream
bug
cannot-reproduce
dependencies
discussion
duplicate
feature-request
feature-request
good first issue
hacktoberfest
help
help wanted
house keeping
invalid
invalid-format
invalid-format
question
releaseblocker 🚨
security
spam
type:enhance-existing
type:new
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/uptime-kuma#2648
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @Smiley-k on GitHub (Oct 1, 2023).
⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.
🏷️ Feature Request Type
Other
🔖 Feature description
possibility of authorization under different users with different access rights.
It would be great to include support for AD\LDAP (FreeIPA), as well as simple local creation of users by e-mail+username.
✔️ Solution
❓ Alternatives
grafana\zabbix - support different authorization tools
📝 Additional Context
No response
@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2023):
@Smiley-k
I think this is a duplicate of https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/1575
If you agree, could you please close this Issue, as duplicates only create immortal zombies and are really hard to issue-manage?
If not, what makes this issue unique enough to require an additional issue? (Could this be integrated into the issue linked above?) ^^
@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2023):
Related #128
@Smiley-k commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2023):
Yes,,,
@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2023):
@Smiley-k Could you close it then?
Only you or louis have the permission to close issues
@Smiley-k commented on GitHub (Oct 18, 2023):
we will wait )