Support external interface call operation #3856

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-28 03:43:11 -05:00 by deekerman · 1 comment

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 03:43:11 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @songzhibin97 on GitHub (Dec 23, 2024).

🏷️ Feature Request Type

API / automation options

🔖 Feature description

It is possible to treat uptime-kuma purely as a service, with functional operations providing api for other services to use

✔️ Solution

You can select uptime-kume for integration in other integrations to provide monitoring content and corresponding notifications, which will give you more options

❓ Alternatives

https://github.com/lucasheld/uptime-kuma-api
https://github.com/MedAziz11/Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

📝 Additional Context

No response

Originally created by @songzhibin97 on GitHub (Dec 23, 2024). ### 📑 I have found these related issues/pull requests - ### 🏷️ Feature Request Type API / automation options ### 🔖 Feature description It is possible to treat uptime-kuma purely as a service, with functional operations providing api for other services to use ### ✔️ Solution You can select uptime-kume for integration in other integrations to provide monitoring content and corresponding notifications, which will give you more options ### ❓ Alternatives https://github.com/lucasheld/uptime-kuma-api https://github.com/MedAziz11/Uptime-Kuma-Web-API ### 📝 Additional Context _No response_

deekerman

2026-02-28 03:43:11 -05:00

closed this issue
added the
feature-request
label

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 03:43:15 -05:00

Author

Owner

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Dec 25, 2024):

implementing a stable, externally facing http API instead of the internal socket.io API is tracked here:

#118

Closing as a duplicate

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Dec 25, 2024): implementing a stable, externally facing http API instead of the internal socket.io API is tracked here: - #118 Closing as a duplicate