SSO Provider Support for Uptime Kuma Login #3943

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-28 03:45:56 -05:00 by deekerman · 3 comments

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 03:45:56 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @mxlb-dev on GitHub (Jan 31, 2025).

none

🏷️ Feature Request Type

Settings

🔖 Feature description

Enable users to leverage their identity / SSO provider (e.g. authentik, authelia, others..) to log into Uptime Kuma.

✔️ Solution

MVP: provide HTTP basic auth as alternative to current HTML login form (SSO provider then acts as proxy to pass-through credentials)
Nice to have: UI toggle between login options

Later release: support for OAuth2/OpenID or similar

❓ Alternatives

No response

📝 Additional Context

No response

Originally created by @mxlb-dev on GitHub (Jan 31, 2025). ### 📑 I have found these related issues/pull requests none ### 🏷️ Feature Request Type Settings ### 🔖 Feature description Enable users to leverage their identity / SSO provider (e.g. authentik, authelia, others..) to log into Uptime Kuma. ### ✔️ Solution MVP: provide HTTP basic auth as alternative to current HTML login form (SSO provider then acts as proxy to pass-through credentials) Nice to have: UI toggle between login options Later release: support for OAuth2/OpenID or similar ### ❓ Alternatives _No response_ ### 📝 Additional Context _No response_

deekerman

2026-02-28 03:45:56 -05:00

closed this issue
added the
feature-request
label

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 03:46:01 -05:00

Author

Owner

@femabeh commented on GitHub (Feb 2, 2025):

I think Something Like openid connect could be useful. And because its and Open Format you could use very identity Provider who Supports it.

@femabeh commented on GitHub (Feb 2, 2025): I think Something Like openid connect could be useful. And because its and Open Format you could use very identity Provider who Supports it.

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 03:46:01 -05:00

Author

Owner

@Pyrrha commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2025):

Related to #553 🙂

This feature would be really nice. An alternative is to configure oauth-proxy as suggested in the linked issue.

@Pyrrha commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2025): Related to #553 🙂 This feature would be really nice. An alternative is to configure oauth-proxy as suggested in the linked issue.

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 03:46:01 -05:00

Author

Owner

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2025):

Lets track this in said issue instead: