The filter looks weird in 2.1.0-beta.2 #4612

Closed
opened 2026-02-28 04:09:14 -05:00 by deekerman · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @louislam on GitHub (Jan 15, 2026).

N/A

🛡️ Security Policy

📝 Description

Does anyone know which pull request affected this?

👟 Reproduction steps

  • Firefox
  • 2560x1440
  • DPI: 150%

👀 Expected behavior

Image

😓 Actual Behavior

Image

🐻 Uptime-Kuma Version

2.1.0-beta.2

💻 Operating System and Arch

Windows 11

🌐 Browser

Firefox

🖥️ Deployment Environment

N/A

📝 Relevant log output


Originally created by @louislam on GitHub (Jan 15, 2026). ### 📑 I have found these related issues/pull requests N/A ### 🛡️ Security Policy - [x] I have read and agree to Uptime Kuma's [Security Policy](https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/security/policy). ### 📝 Description Does anyone know which pull request affected this? ### 👟 Reproduction steps - Firefox - 2560x1440 - DPI: 150% ### 👀 Expected behavior <img width="1135" height="409" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dfef10b2-9066-4e4e-8806-d19aa347ad40" /> ### 😓 Actual Behavior <img width="1152" height="412" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8b80b18c-bdf0-4453-a9f9-5f043a800c79" /> ### 🐻 Uptime-Kuma Version 2.1.0-beta.2 ### 💻 Operating System and Arch Windows 11 ### 🌐 Browser Firefox ### 🖥️ Deployment Environment N/A ### 📝 Relevant log output ```bash session ```
Author
Owner

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jan 15, 2026):

Yes, this was the following:

CC @hemanth5544

I don't have a 2k display at 150%, but when I set my display to have underzoomed resolution I can reproduce this scaling issue.
I did not think of testing if any breakpoints exist beyond 1800p

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jan 15, 2026): Yes, this was the following: - https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/pull/6676 CC @hemanth5544 I don't have a 2k display at 150%, but when I set my display to have underzoomed resolution I can reproduce this scaling issue. I did not think of testing if any breakpoints exist beyond 1800p
Author
Owner

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jan 15, 2026):

maybe also the one followup PR in this area, will have to check

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jan 15, 2026): maybe also the one followup PR in this area, will have to check
Author
Owner

@kurama commented on GitHub (Jan 16, 2026):

Hi, what do you think about this design:

Image

See the draft PR https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/pull/6749

@kurama commented on GitHub (Jan 16, 2026): Hi, what do you think about this design: <img width="521" height="110" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3eaa677c-d657-4cf5-8ea2-8d90c6803c45" /> See the draft PR https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/pull/6749
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/uptime-kuma#4612
No description provided.