mirror of
https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma.git
synced 2026-03-02 22:57:00 -05:00
Grid view for the status page #595
Labels
No labels
A:accessibility
A:api
A:cert-expiry
A:core
A:dashboard
A:deployment
A:documentation
A:domain expiry
A:incidents
A:maintenance
A:metrics
A:monitor
A:notifications
A:reports
A:settings
A:status-page
A:ui/ux
A:user-management
Stale
ai-slop
blocked
blocked-upstream
bug
cannot-reproduce
dependencies
discussion
duplicate
feature-request
feature-request
good first issue
hacktoberfest
help
help wanted
house keeping
invalid
invalid-format
invalid-format
question
releaseblocker 🚨
security
spam
type:enhance-existing
type:new
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/uptime-kuma#595
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @FabianKielmann on GitHub (Nov 26, 2021).
⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.
🏷️ Feature Request Type
UI Feature
🔖 Feature description
We've set up Uptime Kuma in our small IT team and would love to have a separate display for all the soo in the room that displays the status page. But if you have a lot of services on that status page, you soon need to scroll to see the full list. So a grid view would be awesome. Would even consider adding it myself in a fork. Would take me some time though, because I'm not very familiar with vue.
✔️ Solution
Add a grid view for the status page and make it an option to switch to.
❓ Alternatives
Alternatively you could add something like a "minimal" view for the existing list.
📝 Additional Context
No response
@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2024):
Multi column status pages is tracked in #592
I am going to close this issue as I don't see a difference between the proposals.
We can reopen if there is one that I am missing ^^
=> closing as a duplicate