starred/uptime-kuma

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma.git synced 2026-03-02 22:57:00 -05:00

Option to add other users #648

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-28 01:53:21 -05:00 by deekerman · 6 comments

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 01:53:21 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @funky123 on GitHub (Dec 10, 2021).

⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.

I checked and didn't find similar feature request

🏷️ Feature Request Type

UI Feature, Other

🔖 Feature description

You should add the option to add other user accout to view details from status-page e.g. the value of dns checks or the ping delays/history.

✔️ Solution

Adding the UI Feature for the logged-in admin User to add new users via E-Mail or simple username and password as "Viewer" only.

❓ Alternatives

implement a user-rights-management

📝 Additional Context

If there is feature already (and i can't find

Originally created by @funky123 on GitHub (Dec 10, 2021). ### ⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before. - [X] I checked and didn't find similar feature request ### 🏷️ Feature Request Type UI Feature, Other ### 🔖 Feature description You should add the option to add other user accout to view details from status-page e.g. the value of dns checks or the ping delays/history. ### ✔️ Solution Adding the UI Feature for the logged-in admin User to add new users via E-Mail or simple username and password as "Viewer" only. ### ❓ Alternatives implement a user-rights-management ### 📝 Additional Context If there is feature already (and i can't find

deekerman

2026-02-28 01:53:21 -05:00

closed this issue
added the
feature-request

A:user-management
labels

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 01:53:28 -05:00

Author

Owner

@J000K3R commented on GitHub (Dec 28, 2021):

That were great if i can add more Admins or Viewer Only Users.
Please add this Feature.

@J000K3R commented on GitHub (Dec 28, 2021): That were great if i can add more Admins or Viewer Only Users. Please add this Feature.

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 01:53:28 -05:00

Author

Owner

@gruessung commented on GitHub (Jan 5, 2022):

Yes, this would be very helpful.

@gruessung commented on GitHub (Jan 5, 2022): Yes, this would be very helpful.

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 01:53:28 -05:00

Author

Owner

@hteibler commented on GitHub (Jan 16, 2022):

a view only user would be great
or to view without login ( limit via my Firewall )
limit view access via source IP list/ranges

@hteibler commented on GitHub (Jan 16, 2022): - a view only user would be great - or to view without login ( limit via my Firewall ) - limit view access via source IP list/ranges

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 01:53:28 -05:00

Author

Owner

@koen20 commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2022):

Duplicate of #128

@koen20 commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2022): Duplicate of #128

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 01:53:28 -05:00

Author

Owner

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jun 29, 2023):

@funky123 I think this is a duplicate of #128
Duplicates only hurt issue discoverability and lead to zombies, could you either

clairify why this is not a duplicate
or close this issue?

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jun 29, 2023): @funky123 I think this is a duplicate of #128 Duplicates only hurt issue discoverability and lead to zombies, could you either - clairify why this is not a duplicate - or close this issue?

deekerman commented

2026-02-28 01:53:28 -05:00

Author

Owner

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2023):

@funky123
We are consolidating duplicate issues a bit to make issue management easier.
I think, we should track this issue in #128 as there is no functional difference
⇒ I am going to close this as a duplicate.

@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2023): @funky123 We are consolidating duplicate issues a bit to make issue management easier. I think, we should track this issue in #128 as there is no functional difference ⇒ I am going to close this as a duplicate.