mirror of
https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma.git
synced 2026-03-02 22:57:00 -05:00
Make the DNS check also validate a specific record value #677
Labels
No labels
A:accessibility
A:api
A:cert-expiry
A:core
A:dashboard
A:deployment
A:documentation
A:domain expiry
A:incidents
A:maintenance
A:metrics
A:monitor
A:notifications
A:reports
A:settings
A:status-page
A:ui/ux
A:user-management
Stale
ai-slop
blocked
blocked-upstream
bug
cannot-reproduce
dependencies
discussion
duplicate
feature-request
feature-request
good first issue
hacktoberfest
help
help wanted
house keeping
invalid
invalid-format
invalid-format
question
releaseblocker 🚨
security
spam
type:enhance-existing
type:new
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/uptime-kuma#677
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @d3xt3r01 on GitHub (Dec 20, 2021).
⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.
🏷️ Feature Request Type
UI Feature
🔖 Feature description
I'd like to be able to validate the dns reply value also, not just that there is an answer
✔️ Solution
I'd like to be able to specify the expected value (optional) for a dns check
❓ Alternatives
No response
📝 Additional Context
No response
@reitermarkus commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2022):
Would we very useful for monitoring whether my LanCache is working as intended.
@m0dd3r43v3r commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2022):
This would be amazing to monitor unexpected DNS changes by registrar.
@tracure1337 commented on GitHub (May 27, 2022):
This would be super useful indeed.
@jemand771 commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2022):
while the suggested config options are different, this feels similar to #432
also note that another possible solution was/is being discussed in #518
@CommanderStorm commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2023):
@d3xt3r01
I think this is a duplicate of https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/432
If you agree, could you please close this Issue, as duplicates only create immortal zombies and are really hard to issue-manage?
If not, what makes this issue unique enough to require an additional issue? (Could this be integrated into the issue linked above?) ^^
(this issue is the less popluar one by numner of 👍🏻 on issues, which some maintainers use to prioritise work)
@d3xt3r01 commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2023):
See #432