mirror of
https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden.git
synced 2026-03-02 22:57:18 -05:00
Push new docker image to support SSO #804
Labels
No labels
SSO
Third party
better for forum
bug
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
future Vault
future Vault
future Vault
good first issue
help wanted
low priority
notes
question
troubleshooting
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/vaultwarden#804
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @yggdrasil-tynor on GitHub (Sep 11, 2020).
Was released 2 days ago: https://github.com/bitwarden/web/releases/tag/v2.16.0
@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2020):
SSO Will not work without server-side changes.
We probably have to implement a lot of code to support this.
Only updating the web-vault will not do the trick.
@Crow-Control commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2020):
I've looked into it, the server-side changes are actually quite minimal. Their implementation is basically comparable to a reverse proxy in front of bitwarden (but integrated), it does not replace the normal login and master-password requirements.
Some more info:
https://github.com/bitwarden/server/commits/fd6b10df564778ea73c00e8dcecc00aa74c5eb7d/src/Core/Enums/SsoType.cs
https://bitwarden.com/help/article/getting-started-with-sso/
@xdubx commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2020):
It would play into my hands if that were to be implemented. But I can only support the statement of Ornias1993.
@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2020):
Everyone can create a PR to implement this 😉.
Would be nice to have this, including all lot of other stuff.
When someone has time to implement this it will probably be pushed and merged.
@littlebigmedia commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2020):
This would be huge if added correctly!
@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2020):
To keep the issue tracker more focused, I'm closing this issue in favor of the meta issue at #246
@Crow-Control commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2020):
@BlackDex Besides the fact that it has nothing to do with a docker image needing to be pushed.
@pinpox commented on GitHub (Jul 22, 2021):
I'd like to implement this, but would need a bit of guidance since I've not worked on valtwarden yet. @Ornias1993 What/where would be a good starting point for the changes you mentioned? Would be great to get any pointers!
@jiwanovski87 commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2021):
@pinpox Have you already started with the implementation?
@pinpox commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2021):
@jiwanovski87 There has been some work here: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/pull/1955
@BloodyIron commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2023):
Can we get SAML?