mirror of
https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja.git
synced 2026-03-03 00:46:57 -05:00
percentDone gives an float64 error #754
Labels
No labels
area/api
area/caldav
area/filters
area/frontend
area/gantt
area/internal-code
area/typesense
bug
changes requested
confirmed
dependencies
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
kind/bug
kind/feature
needs reproduction
question
security
support
upstream issue
waiting for reply
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/vikunja-go-vikunja#754
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @Marck on GitHub (Jan 19, 2026).
Description
I have created a new view with the following syntax:
Also tried with '70' and other comparisons, same error.
That gives not only no results (I have a task with a progress of 80%) but also gives the following internal server error:
I cannot get the Internal server error on the demo site, but it could be that the errors are not shown to that frontend.
Vikunja Version
v1.0.0-rc3
Browser and version
No response
Can you reproduce the bug on the Vikunja demo site?
No
Screenshots
@kolaente commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2026):
Does it work with the latest unstable build?
Are you using typesense?
@Marck commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026):
I havent tried that, good suggestion. I will check that and come back to you.
I am using typesense yes
@kolaente commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2026):
Does it work without typesense?
@Marck commented on GitHub (Feb 1, 2026):
@kolaente, I have confirmed the issue is gone when using the unstable tag and disabling typesense so that is good.
I do see that the view doesn't find any tasks with a progress 70% or more (also not on the demo site).
I created one with a progress of 90%
It could also be me misunderstanding the query.