splitting piles inside a holder with `childrenPerOwner` doesn't remove the `owner` #672

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-20 10:19:37 -05:00 by deekerman · 1 comment

deekerman commented

2026-02-20 10:19:37 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @ArnoldSmith86 on GitHub (Feb 14, 2023).

See title. Half of the cards leave the holder without resetting the owner.

Originally created by @ArnoldSmith86 on GitHub (Feb 14, 2023). See title. Half of the cards leave the holder without resetting the `owner`.

deekerman added the

bug

widget properties

labels

2026-02-20 10:19:37 -05:00

deekerman commented

2026-02-20 10:19:38 -05:00

Author

Owner

@robartsd commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2023):

If the pile was formed manually by the player in a holder that does not align children, I'd expect both piles to be in the holder - ideally without triggering any leave / enter behavior; but yeah, if the holder is aligning the children, the split off pile should not be in the holder so all leave behavior should be honored.

@robartsd commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2023): If the pile was formed manually by the player in a holder that does not align children, I'd expect both piles to be in the holder - ideally without triggering any leave / enter behavior; but yeah, if the holder is aligning the children, the split off pile should not be in the holder so all leave behavior should be honored.