starred/AdGuardHome

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome.git synced 2026-03-04 00:01:12 -05:00

Allow one time or temporary unblock of sites on the client #1422

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-04 01:17:24 -05:00 by deekerman · 8 comments

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 01:17:24 -05:00

Owner

Originally created by @danyal on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020).

Problem
Sometimes you visit a site and they use a referral or affiliate link which is blocked. It's a hassle to have to manually whitelist the link and if you're not an admin, you're stuck.

Solution
Similar to what ublock origin does, allow the user to decide if they want to proceed "temporary" or "whitelist". Ideally temporary allows you to proceed one time but could also be time based.

Originally created by @danyal on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020). **Problem** Sometimes you visit a site and they use a referral or affiliate link which is blocked. It's a hassle to have to manually whitelist the link and if you're not an admin, you're stuck. **Solution** Similar to what ublock origin does, allow the user to decide if they want to proceed "temporary" or "whitelist". Ideally temporary allows you to proceed one time but could also be time based.

deekerman

2026-03-04 01:17:24 -05:00

closed this issue
added the
duplicate
label

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 01:17:31 -05:00

Author

Owner

@ghost commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020):

Solution for it https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/issues/997 and https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/issues/435

but could also be time based. https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/issues/1203

You may able to get benefit from https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/issues/1081 temporally.

@ghost commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020): Solution for it https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/issues/997 and https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/issues/435 > but could also be time based. https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/issues/1203 You may able to get benefit from https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/issues/1081 temporally.

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 01:17:31 -05:00

Author

Owner

@hoshsadiq commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2020):

Would be great to have it similar to #1879

@hoshsadiq commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2020): Would be great to have it similar to #1879

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 01:17:31 -05:00

Author

Owner

@temporallyaccount commented on GitHub (Oct 7, 2020):

Solution for it #997 and #435 but could also be time based. #1203 You may able to get benefit from #1081 temporally.

This would be great solution with pre-configured lists for temporally block or unblock sites and services for particular time.

Would be great to have it similar to #1879

It'll disable whole filtering feature for selected time period (pi-hole feature as mentioned in it).

I add explanation comment about this feature. first #997 more essential for other DNS server users to gain or provide limited access to web interface than expose access to public or does something complicated with firewalls.
Now AGH beta has block/unblock, block/unblock for this client only options under each row drop down in query log.

⌚ Allow one time or temporary unblock of sites on the client ⌚

Block/Unblock
Block/Unblock for this client only
Block/Unblock for [time] minutes 🆕
Block/Unblock [time] min for this client 🆕

Default [time] config options must be in other area in UI for set like we can configure cache size. These block/unblock rules shouldn't write to custom filtering rules.

That's all. i only wanted to explain the idea (not a vote for this feature or i don't have any dislike)

@temporallyaccount commented on GitHub (Oct 7, 2020): > Solution for it #997 and #435 but could also be time based. #1203 You may able to get benefit from #1081 temporally. This would be great solution with pre-configured lists for temporally block or unblock sites and services for particular time. >Would be great to have it similar to #1879 It'll disable whole filtering feature for selected time period (pi-hole feature as mentioned in it). I add explanation comment about this feature. first #997 more essential for other DNS server users to gain or provide limited access to web interface than expose access to public or does something complicated with firewalls. Now AGH beta has block/unblock, block/unblock for this client only options under each row drop down in query log. :watch: **Allow one time or temporary unblock of sites on the client** :watch: - Block/Unblock - Block/Unblock for this client only - Block/Unblock for [time] minutes :new: - Block/Unblock [time] min for this client :new: Default [time] config options must be in other area in UI for set like we can configure cache size. These block/unblock rules shouldn't write to custom filtering rules. That's all. i only wanted to explain the idea (not a vote for this feature or i don't have any dislike)

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 01:17:31 -05:00

Author

Owner

@temporallyaccount commented on GitHub (Oct 7, 2020):

Solution
Similar to what ublock origin does, allow the user to decide if they want to proceed "temporary" or "whitelist". Ideally temporary allows you to proceed one time but could also be time based.

I see, this feature partially implemented already except time based option.

@temporallyaccount commented on GitHub (Oct 7, 2020): >Solution Similar to what ublock origin does, allow the user to decide if they want to proceed "temporary" or "whitelist". Ideally temporary allows you to proceed one time but could also be time based. I see, this feature partially implemented already except time based option.

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 01:17:31 -05:00

Author

Owner

@Aikatsui commented on GitHub (May 17, 2021):

Duplicate of #2823

@Aikatsui commented on GitHub (May 17, 2021): Duplicate of #2823

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 01:17:31 -05:00

Author

Owner

@hoshsadiq commented on GitHub (May 17, 2021):

@Aikatsui that issue is different. That's adding an individual domain to the allow list temporarily (or disabling a rule temporarily), whereas this issue is globally disabling AGH temporarily.

@hoshsadiq commented on GitHub (May 17, 2021): @Aikatsui that issue is different. That's adding an individual domain to the allow list temporarily (or disabling a rule temporarily), whereas this issue is globally disabling AGH temporarily.

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 01:17:31 -05:00

Author

Owner

@hoshsadiq commented on GitHub (May 18, 2021):

Heh, I stand corrected. I thought this was a different issue.

@hoshsadiq commented on GitHub (May 18, 2021): Heh, I stand corrected. I thought this was a different issue.

deekerman commented

2026-03-04 01:17:31 -05:00

Author

Owner

@ainar-g commented on GitHub (May 18, 2021):

That other one seems to already have a milestone attached, so we'll probably merge this one into that one. Thanks, everyone.

@ainar-g commented on GitHub (May 18, 2021): That other one seems to already have a milestone attached, so we'll probably merge this one into that one. Thanks, everyone.

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/AdGuardHome#1422

No description provided.

Rows
Columns