mirror of
https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome.git
synced 2026-03-04 00:01:12 -05:00
Is it possbile to add an option/param to enable the time range control for the Hosts Blocklists #3793
Labels
No labels
P1: Critical
P2: High
P3: Medium
P4: Low
UI
bug
cannot reproduce
compatibility
dependencies
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
external libs
feature request
good first issue
help wanted
infrastructure
invalid
localization
needs investigation
performance
potential-duplicate
question
recurrent
research
snap
waiting for data
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/AdGuardHome#3793
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @GreatMichaelLee on GitHub (Jul 16, 2022).
Have a question or an idea? Please search it on our forum to make sure it was not yet asked. If you cannot find what you had in mind, please submit it here.
Prerequisites
Please answer the following questions for yourself before submitting an issue. YOU MAY DELETE THE PREREQUISITES SECTION.
Problem Description
It is incovinence that there is no time range control(allow/deny) for the host blocklists, so if once I enable it ,it will be applied all day until if I disable or remove it. In some case, I have to enable/disable those rules by day or night situation and seems for now there is no way to implement this. (if there is, please let me know).
Proposed Solution
If it is possilbe that to implement an addition parameter to be parsed that which can control this custom filtering rules enable/disable regarding to the configured time range? like this
||google.com^$time='22:00-07:00' --> by default it is all day, and if configured, then only the specified time is effective.
Alternatives Considered
if it is possible that I can private define the "blocked service" to implement this is also ok.
Additional Information
NA
@ainar-g commented on GitHub (Aug 24, 2022):
Duplicate of #1203 and many other similar issues. This is should at least partially be implemented in the v0.108 cycle.