mirror of
https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent.git
synced 2026-03-02 22:57:32 -05:00
New logo #1202
Labels
No labels
Accessibility
AppImage
Bounty
Build system
CI
Can't reproduce
Code cleanup
Confirmed bug
Confirmed bug
Core
Crash
Data loss
Discussion
Docker
Documentation
Duplicate
Feature
Feature request
Feature request
Feature request
Filters
Flatpak
GUI
Has workaround
I2P
Invalid
Libtorrent
Look and feel
Meta
NSIS
Network
Not an issue
OS: *BSD
OS: Linux
OS: Windows
OS: macOS
PPA
Performance
Project management
Proxy/VPN
Qt bugs
Qt6 compat
RSS
Search engine
Security
Temp folder
Themes
Translations
Triggers
Waiting diagnosis
Waiting info
Waiting upstream
Waiting web implementation
Watched folders
WebAPI
WebUI
autoCloseOldIssue
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/qBittorrent#1202
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @eastgate on GitHub (Feb 9, 2014).
I know that there has been an ongoing discussion for a revamp of the user interface and logo. I designed something quickly that I thought would make a more professional logo and allow greater recognition of the client.

The "q" and "b" are of course present, as well as a download/upload theme. There is also a hint of the infinity symbol. Infinitely connected and sharing.
@sledgehammer999 commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2014):
Just so you know the image didn't upload....
@matt31 commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2014):
What's wrong with the current logo? I like the baby dragon. :)
Or you mean the icon?
@eastgate commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2014):
Oops, got it fixed now.
matt31 - yes, the icon.
@sledgehammer999 commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2014):
Just so you know, I appreciate the work and effort you put into it. I don't think we are in need of changing the logo.
Either that or I subconsciously didn't like it. I don't want to offend you, but you know that art is more or less subjective. At first glance your artwork didn't "jump up" to say "yeah we need to change our logo to that".
Sorry. Anyways, I welcome others' opinion on this.
@ngosang commented on GitHub (May 15, 2015):
@sledgehammer999 This looks like a good chance to modernize the icon. https://qbforums.shiki.hu/index.php/topic,3452.0.html
@Chocobo1 commented on GitHub (May 15, 2015):
On a technical side, I think we should ask the designer to submit the artwork in these formats:
... and so on
@thalieht commented on GitHub (Jun 5, 2017):
OP disappeared and with #6484 in the horizon this issue has no purpose.