mirror of
https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent.git
synced 2026-03-02 22:57:32 -05:00
delete torrent + "also delete files on hard disk" #3213
Labels
No labels
Accessibility
AppImage
Bounty
Build system
CI
Can't reproduce
Code cleanup
Confirmed bug
Confirmed bug
Core
Crash
Data loss
Discussion
Docker
Documentation
Duplicate
Feature
Feature request
Feature request
Feature request
Filters
Flatpak
GUI
Has workaround
I2P
Invalid
Libtorrent
Look and feel
Meta
NSIS
Network
Not an issue
OS: *BSD
OS: Linux
OS: Windows
OS: macOS
PPA
Performance
Project management
Proxy/VPN
Qt bugs
Qt6 compat
RSS
Search engine
Security
Temp folder
Themes
Translations
Triggers
Waiting diagnosis
Waiting info
Waiting upstream
Waiting web implementation
Watched folders
WebAPI
WebUI
autoCloseOldIssue
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/qBittorrent#3213
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @ifmihai on GitHub (Oct 19, 2015).
This issue is mostly about videos (and archives sometimes)
Videos
I use VLC to see videos, and when it comes to subtitles, i use its plugin => the subtitle is downloaded inside the torrent's folder.
When I hit delete torrent + "also delete files on hard disk" => the folder will not be erased completely, because of the subtitle.
It's probably because of design? I don't know, but I would certainly like that folder erased completely.
In the same time, I'm not able now to see possible negative implications if folder is erased entirely.
Archives
The easiest route with 7zip or winrar is to unpack directly inside the torrent's folder.
Here also, I would prefer to see the entire folder erased.
If there are no negative implications by complete erase, would you consider to implement it in future versions?
@chrishirst commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2015):
@alfrix commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2015):
@sledgehammer999 this a duplicate of #1606
and very well explained in
https://qbforums.shiki.hu/index.php/topic,3738.0.html
@sledgehammer999 commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2015):
Even if it isn't a dupe this is bad idea.